(1) what he said
(2) then take all of the other answers
(3) blend thoroughly with your question
(4) enjoy!
2006-08-13 21:33:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jon 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Ahh! May, I , please exclaim the exact Universal A real that ferociously cages our breath in the bi-lateral duality of a tri-aparte question of the innate knowledge a pirori and, ever so, kindfully and share a cup of java,so,that we may let our reflection that garnishily embraces our soul's A real of the perfect idealistic Universal Philosopher's A priori of , which , in turn, a Universal Philosopher's hyperisticapyschlilization and may, we, touch on a subject in philosophy that has eluded the past and present philosopher's objective and subjective mind's mindfully mindful mind and the object of that mindfully body's mind deflates our breaths and causes the mind's life to seep out into the universal starlit heavens for,how,has it,that, the small channel of epistemic pre-production of pre-conceptionate illusions dig us in the analytic deep-seated roots of the mind's perceptive precognitons of the reflective anemiccally, not of the life of the mind and it's internal components, such as, transmittal nuerosymbicsynopticalilization's decreasing axiom of the life out of the mind A real A prioritic precoginitive properties, the synthesized virus that decreases the pre-anaytical judgement of the illusions of the forthcoming soul's drenching toughtout thoughts, and the boiling energies of the rivers surpitating ever across the subcutanoues tops of the pre-illusional waters in the vitality of the meaningful embedding of the life's actualization, but of the downward spiral of anamesis that impeeds the coginative properties ontologically and cosmoloically threathens the mind's soufully soul's soul in the hinderance of the a priotic heartbeat that exasperates the A real of the dual concept arousing a heartless mind's breathing resulting in the mind's exasperation. In a word, if the pre-dulusive A real delusional cogintive cognitions of are real, then, it,is to explicate that the deluded mental recovery of the knowing of the unknowing known of what is it to be the epistemic vitality of the the unkown a prioritic maxims and axioms of the dark shadows roaming around swirling over each other in the metapyshical seas of the metapyshical planes and what it is to be drowning in the universal channels of the earth's becoming for the mindful toughtout processes flowing concidefully next to each in the inquistive meaningful presumptuous assumptions of the mind's life process to humanity, therefore, the clarity of the anamnesis is that the flashing neroutramitters manufacture and manifest descriptive a prioritc graphical A real's that seeps into the mind's energystream and the premontions of A proiri epistemic innate ideas are doubted by the mind's popping A real's clariftic production.
2006-08-13 23:42:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by royaldrkblue 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
I was going to give a real answer to this hodge podge of old greek terms, but that charley guy did such a good job of twisting your twist I think I will let it go at that.
Asker (AJ) wrote; (In somewhat modern English)
What is the universally accepted membrance (teaching) of what exists in the universe that contains our planets and all the stars around us that troubles our thoughts.
Charley wrote: (In somewhat goofy play on words)
It is a transformed, petrified version of the absorption of gas. Related to octopus from Tasmania that affect the relationship between the message sending chemicals in the brain.
What a lark, that guy might have more on the ball than he lets us know.
He's saying in a round about way that it is an old fossilized school of thought that makes me feel like farting and has about as much relationship to the human brain as an octopus from Tasmania!!
Oh sheesh I laughed too hard to type my answer for a couple minutes.
Harley Charley gets my vote!!!!
2006-08-14 19:33:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by mindbender - seeker of truth 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nice try. You hear the bell but have no idea which church. It would be even better if your question made a grammatical sense.
Anamnesis is an ancient and obsolete concept. I don't think any philosopher seriously believes that people are born with the a priori knowledge which just waits to be "rediscovered".
2006-08-13 21:54:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
IT is a transmorgrafied version of plasmosis. It is related to Tasmanian calamari and affects the symbiotic neurotransmitters.
2006-08-13 21:16:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Harley Charley 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Would you care to translate that into English? No, seriously. We'd like to answer your question, but have no idea what you're trying to ask.
Unless that was the purpose....
2006-08-13 21:36:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
ohhh, I get it, thanks
2006-08-13 21:17:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by silas h 3
·
0⤊
2⤋