Among the many potential candidates, which include a few women , Hillary Clinton, Oprah Winfrey, Condoleesa Rice, etc... I personnally like the ladies but I would prefer Dr. Phil. I believe he would be a good president.
2006-08-13 20:06:07 · 26 answers · asked by montralia 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Hell no he is owned by Oprah
2006-08-13 20:13:28 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would hate to see him psycoanylise the president of Iran, but no I wouldn't vote for him he has no experience neither does Hillary, Oprah, Condoleesa. I think that we should have an average person who knows exactly what the people want and what the people need
2006-08-13 20:12:56 · answer #2 · answered by jslewis81 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding?
Let us look at the facts. He first appeared to be a caring individual who wanted to help people and would go on Oprah once a week to discuss issues. Then he got his own show and decided that exploiting people would be more fun. He is like a watered down version of Jerry Springer. I think Phil's show is terrible and sad. I think he is sick for doing what he is doing and it is all about making a buck. It is all about the dollar...like he didn't have enough. He doesn't care about people.
You want someone like THAT to be president. We might as well just keep George W.
2006-08-13 20:14:19 · answer #3 · answered by Amelia 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yup. I'd vote for Dr. Phil. I like his tough love approach and he could get the country to run smooth again by being persuasive. Hey, the country might have better relations with the rest of the world under him since he knows psychology.
2006-08-13 21:15:12 · answer #4 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That might be a good president. He seems to get to root of problems and Help more people than harm like some we know (I.E.) Bush. You know the Bush are not good presidents. I don't feel it is right that a child of a form president can be. You should see the string pulling. Most people are out for pleasing their parnets. Bush could not finish his war in 91 cause good ole Clinton made it into office. What would do with him having no chance to get back into office to finish and make a mark. Push my child into the postion. It is time for history to bury the bush.
2006-08-13 20:33:08 · answer #5 · answered by ordain_angel 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dr. Phil is a psychologist. He has no major in politics. To my knowledge he has never studied anything relating to the subject. As a peace ambassador he'd do ok. As a president, no. He doesn't know how politics works.
2006-08-13 20:35:38 · answer #6 · answered by JJ M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell no. Or anyone that is on the Oprah kiss *** band wagon. Hilary...no way! She let her husband cheat on her in front of a nation and did nothing. Just imagine what the vicious leaders of the world would do if she were in office. Condi is the only one from your list that is somewhat worthy.
2006-08-13 20:53:42 · answer #7 · answered by patient X 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No nonsense Dr. Phil fingers down. i think he must be the only with the middle to brush aside the ACLU and extremely go about cleansing up the streets of all this vermon strolling round wreaking havoc in our society. he's a actual guy no longer frightened of you librals.
2016-12-06 12:20:19 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about seeing a real person run for president. Like say I don't know a soldier from the USMC or Army that has seen combat. I don't mean Kerry Combat either where you pay for your medals and shoot yourself in the foot for a purple heart.
2006-08-13 21:10:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO. And the ones I want to run for office wont run. Former governor Jim Hunt of north carolina and former nc governor Jim Martin, Then of course there is Hillary Clinton.
www.kcm.org
2006-08-13 20:12:54 · answer #10 · answered by aguyinthewoods 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why? He is a phony have you ever read any of his books? Personally would like to see a female run for presidency which one I am not sure. Vote 4 Phil NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-08-13 20:13:33 · answer #11 · answered by thornemyangel 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋