1) Love moves the world to kneel in awe.
2) The world moves for love,
It kneels before it in awe.
2006-08-13 19:58:20 · 11 answers · asked by kutulu2003 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Statement 1 sounds like Love is controling and forces the world to kneel.
Statement 2 sounds like the world chooses to kneel for love because it is in awe.
Kathy
2006-08-13 20:08:34 · answer #1 · answered by c2god2 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the first statement love is the aggressor per se...in the second it is the world. I like the first statement better...love is in control not the world...which is actually the opposite of reality.
2006-08-14 03:06:13 · answer #2 · answered by alexajbully 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First one tells us that the world is in awe when we're in love, and the second one shows it moves for love. hmm...interesting.
2006-08-14 03:06:22 · answer #3 · answered by Mousey 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither strike me just right but I like the second one better, it seems to be more interesting than the other. I like the way it reads better. The first seems too plain.
2006-08-14 03:04:16 · answer #4 · answered by cassandra581 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion, the first is the best. It is short and straight to the point. No pesky commas for breaks and such.. Also, the first one is alot more passionate.
2006-08-14 03:05:52 · answer #5 · answered by bleakpurity999 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go with the first one. Much simpler.
Shouldn't've put it up on YA though; now they own the copyright.
Good writing, though. Live and learn.
2006-08-14 04:20:30 · answer #6 · answered by sincere12_26 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the first makes love seem nice and almost magical, while the second made me feel as if love demands power.
2006-08-14 03:23:31 · answer #7 · answered by xxmetal_healthxx 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The differences make me feel indifferent; it's all painfully trite.
2006-08-14 06:00:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yawn!
2006-08-14 03:04:16 · answer #9 · answered by sameer s 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Uhhhhh...
2006-08-14 03:11:32 · answer #10 · answered by silas h 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋