English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Men never say that when looking for a woman. What does it tell "us" (society) about woman. I thought woman were trying to break away from dependency on a man.

2006-08-13 19:05:48 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

20 answers

it is natural that any woman would want to be taken care of

2006-08-13 19:12:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Financially stable can mean that the guy's not gonna live off of her. I'm not sure that by saying so means that she's expecting to be living off of him. I suppose a guy can say that a woman needs to be financially stable also, too.

But the whole courtship process is totally screwed up. To this day, men have the unenviable role of being the pursuer. This means men pretty much have to do whatever it takes to get the women to accept them. This means men have to satisfy whatever checklist of criteria the women have.

To be fair, men have their own checklist as well. Typically she has to look attractive, nice body, etc. Although in recent times men get criticized for being shallow for this. But women continue to be exempt from what can be construed as the gold-digger mentality. Just looking at the answer so far shows that she's being pragmatic when she wants the guy to be financially well-to-do.

There are TONS of other areas where there are discrepancies between men and women when it comes to this "mating" ritual. I don't have time or room to get into them all.

But. Here's the rub: you can argue all day long about what's right or wrong. In the end you may be right. But you'd be alone.

2006-08-13 19:28:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Here's the truth:

We say financially stable because even though we as women want to be dependant, we do not want a broke man. Deep down we want to be taken care of, we want that security of knowing that you will be there to take care of things. Most people think money= security.

Now Ladies,
I Know we all love beyonce's song "Independent", but let's look at what we have done. These men do not know what they are to do now. They think Oh, you make the money, you take care of the kids, you have this big career, you can even please yourself, what do you need me for? Ladies we need to relinquish some of the control back to the men, so they can be the kind of men we need them to be, strong and loving, and dependable.

Men:
We need you to quit being wusses and get back in the game, We really can't do it all by ourselves, but we are forced to because you've been sitting on the bench. Men, wine and dine and quit whining about women being gold diggers you and only you are in charge of your finances. Romance a woman, tell how how beutiful she looks, how she makes you feel, start courting, opening doors, pulling out chairs, be firm not controling. you say the roles have been reversed they have not really it's just we don't get the above things from you, and don't know how to act when we get even a little hint.

2006-08-13 19:30:24 · answer #3 · answered by milescoltrane_2000 2 · 0 0

Because they dont want to get into a relationship if they are going to be the one to maintain everything. Some women just expect the man to be the caretaker and breadwinner, which is traditional. So she is either a traditionalist or someone just interested in spending the guys money. I would look at other clues in the woman's profile to see which it might most likely be.

Really, no one wants to be with a loser, though being financially stable doesn't necessarily imply anything.

Look at most women's profiles on match sites and most read almost exactly the same "makes me laugh, financially stable, likes to have fun" I mean, these are all ideals as a match and is just a cliche.

2006-08-13 19:15:33 · answer #4 · answered by soulblazer28 2 · 0 0

That phrase has nothing to do with dependancy on a man, in fact I inturpret it as her just making sure that he's not expecting to be depending on her. Having had a past b/f who didn't work the 1 1/2 years we were together, whose car payments I made, I would now look for a man who can support himself IE financially stable not neccisarilly rich, which those girls exist, but that's a different story

2006-08-13 19:17:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Most women are looking for different things in a mate than a man is. It really has less to do with dependancy on a man than that they don't want a man who wants to depend on them. When a woman wants a relationship, they want someone who they can depend on, who they can believe in, and who they can have a home with. You can't have that with a deadbeet who wants to lay about at home while his woman is working her a** off.

2006-08-13 19:12:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

no longer a history fan eh. Do you remember the function of a lady that men made enable's say back in the 1900's? Do you remember how not person-friendly women human beings had to strive against merely to be able to vote? i'm afraid men made their personal monsters, for it grow to be men that wrote the unique regulations, set the criteria, made the guidelines and so on and so on. Oh what an information superhighway we weave eh. type of created their personal monsters. might want to I request that you do not generalize even as concerning people. there are a range of guys that are emotionally good and ladies human beings that are financially take care of. Why ya imagine Oprah by no skill married Stedman? what percentage lady actresses that were taken to the cleaners by technique of their ex husbands, now to not instruct i visit allow you to recognize I actually were operating into an rather good type of unmarried verify fathers lately. we are continually going to have those gold diggers and all round low existence women human beings in the international as we are those low existence unhonorables men that get married for each and each of the incorrect causes, which have children for each and each of the incorrect causes. suited to easily go away them to their destiny - misery.

2016-11-25 00:00:03 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

they are, but most guys who aren't finantially stable will be leaning on the woman to support them. also, not being financially stable is often an indicator that the guy isn't really responsible or mature in his decision-making abilities. and unless there's an understanding that the man will do housework and take care of kids, that often gets dumped on the woman, as well.

2006-08-13 19:12:56 · answer #8 · answered by mistrydder 2 · 2 0

I do not think women are necessarily looking for someone to support them; it is a way of avoiding men who manage finances poorly and are in debt. I think both men and women who manage their finances well want to avoid those that don't. I was married to someone who did not have a clue how to manage money and save. Needless to say, I am no longer married to them. Many people pay their bills and handle money responsibly. Speaking for myself, I would never involve myself with someone who cannot handle money again.

2006-08-13 19:12:22 · answer #9 · answered by ValleyViolet 6 · 2 0

For better for stay, for worse for divorce, finito!
Women look for comfort & enjoyment. Irrespective of your age or ugliness, if you're rich you'll date Miss America.
Edit: Sorry, I mean Miss America will date you!

2006-08-13 19:14:15 · answer #10 · answered by Prof. Virgo 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers