2006-08-13 18:41:37 · 5 answers · asked by shahz 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That works. Peace.
2006-08-13 18:49:52 · answer #1 · answered by wildrover 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, because one of the common problems why gov't projects don't reach their full potentials, some aren't even finished, is the lack of continuity, 6 years sometimes isn't enough.
But first the entire electoral process and the laws supporting it must be fixed thus preventing most of the problems that plague the current system, such as corruption and abuse of power by those in public offices.
2006-08-15 04:23:32 · answer #2 · answered by ang3lzer0 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yup but 5 years seems reasonable. in indonesia use 5 year term. and.but why u think it must have four year term? every nation has it own constitution. and it is hard to change the constitution.
2006-08-13 18:52:01 · answer #3 · answered by richi rasyid 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's wrong with six year term? That means lesser money to spend and more time to serve.
2006-08-13 21:01:47 · answer #4 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree it is up to them!
2006-08-13 18:55:38 · answer #5 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋