Do you fully believe what ANY politician tells you? Republican or Democrat. They can't speak the truth, the public won't let them (i.e. Political Correctness!), national security won't allow it (if you're fighting a war and someone asks you what your next move is, in a public forum, you're going to tell them???!!!). So no, this ain't a "They all Lie" rant, sure they do, so it's up to you to find the truth from many sources, then question the motivation of that source.
2006-08-13 17:55:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by blakest.anthony 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the most part yes. Here is the kicker though, Clinton, Kerry ect. said Saddam was a danger and he had WMD. The inspectors discovered an anthrax factory over there, and that's why Saddam kicked the inspectors out. Clinton sent missles and wanted to send ground troops but his advisors told him no.
Saddam had plenty of time to move the WMD and truck after truck was viewed on satelite going into Syria from Iraq previous to the invasion. I cannot understand why Bush didn't explain this. It was all over the conservative media. Instead it was like-"well we didn't find anything. I don't understand the secrecy, but if we knew everything Bush and the govt knew that was going on we would need to all be on anxiety medicine.
2006-08-14 00:57:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Paul S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. politicians were originally created to be the puppets controlled by a higher person/group that wished to remain faceless. politicians strictly do as they are told when they are told to do so. they lie through their teeth make false promises they dont intend to keep. they decide that money and oil is more important than the lives of several thousand of their own people (9/11 is going to allow Bush to steal oil from a third world country). they force us to be subjected to the lies in school. encourage higher education also known as further brain washing. if everyone went on to college we wouldnt have janitors or phys ed teachers. the man cant tie his shoes his speech writer will most likely kill himself after the Bush administration because no one will like him after Bush blantently drvies the country into the ground. Bush has trouble pronouncing words. on top of that he creates his own words and expects us to understand them. i feel bad for texas, they take the heat for his lack of literacy. furthermore that whole patriot act, yeah in the fine print it says "this boils down to abolishing the first amendment".
when clinton ran things, sure he did some off the wall things but the country was in ship-shape. less then like a year of being in office were at war with a country no one had heard of before. afghani-what? this is why i vote democrat. now im not saying kerry wouldve done a better job, im just saying Bush? comon...
2006-08-14 01:03:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by xi3reakeroi3cx 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, to go against him is to be label as an anti-American. That is why we have a big issue with Illegal Immigration. That is something that a section of America can focus on with hate and put Iraq in the back burner.
I think he and his administration underestimate Americans, just like the foreign enemies, there will be a lot of support from Americans when we are attacked.
We do not like to hang around and punish out enemies, we just spank them hard and let them think about it. The spanking is coming soon.
2006-08-14 01:06:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by timer 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
He has never told the truth!! He doesn't know what the truth is. He lives in a other world!
Look at the stupid statement by Bush while in Florida when he said that we begin to tax corporations when they are losing money, and that wasn't fair! 48 corporations paid no taxes at all, but they give out dividends to share holders who didn't work a day! Huh???
2006-08-14 00:56:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sometimes- but just reading all these answers I can clearly see most of the people here only listens to main stream media, and the ACLU. Say folks their is a lot of information out in the world get a clue......
2006-08-14 02:10:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by corky 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Partially. The best lies are the ones flavored with truths(it keeps people guessing while you continue with your own agenda). His administration's actions have failed to prove their case yet they continue to proceed as if they have or don't have too and the American public along with the world(with few exceptions) for the most part allow it to happen.Peace.
2006-08-14 01:15:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by wildrover 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
What motive could he have in lying to you that would effect you personally ? He is trying to secure energy for this countries future. Want to heat your home with candles ?
2006-08-14 01:35:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He told me to ignore insignificant remarks . I believe him .
2006-08-14 00:56:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no,he doesn't even know what he's talking about.he's just reading the speech which prepared by a consultant
2006-08-17 18:49:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by chuckyvida 1
·
0⤊
0⤋