Illegal? What law states that is illegal to disarm a terrorist group?
Illogical? When a step will stop the killing going on, is it illogical?
Well, you might think it is right to kill, but I think it is wrong, and the sooner it stops, the better. Nobody wins a war.
2006-08-13 17:57:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by lottyjoy 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Once more Hezbollah is a terrorist organization that started the war. They hid behind the bodies of their followers and then cried foul when Israel bombed them. They hid military targets in civilian areas or fired from the midst of civilians. I am truly sorry for the innocent civilians that were killed as a result of Hezbollah's manipulations and lies. The terrorists that are feeding the Hezbollah from Iran and Syria are no better. But what makes me truly sad is that so many people are buying into the lies the liberal press are spewing forth everyday. No one is willing to do more to find out the truth, because the truth is scary and might mean changes. I am not sure where you live, but if it is in the US, many men and women have died for your right to write the stuff you are saying. Perhaps, if you are so unhappy here, you might try moving to Iran or Syria and see how well you can express your opinions freely.
2006-08-13 17:50:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by msfyrebyrd 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hezbollah claims US and Israel is evil for existing.
US and Israel and the rest of the CIVILIZED world believe that Hezbollah and the rest of the Islamic zealots (and of course, the normal peaceloving Islamic sects) have the right to exist as they wish to celebrate heir beliefs.
When the belief of ANY religion or state is based on the destruction of another, that cancer must be removed. History has proven it. Read about Nazi, KKK, and others.
Enough said
2006-08-13 17:45:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
i might definately accept as true with propose face right here, the exterior supporters of the two facets upon Israel and Iran might create drastic repercussions by using the excellent international community. Iran consistently utilising in addition scary techniques of alternative international locations which incorporate North Korea, and leaders which incorporate Chavez consistently attempt to tempt and galvanize international locations like the U.S. and Israel. lran has been attempting to do some thing with a inhabitants that at the instant does not help the regime in capability (virtually over 80% of the present inhabitants are between the a while of 20-early 30's) hence they straight away discovered by using examples like the present protests that only utilising rigidity won't income administration of its youthful/and massive majority of the inhabitants. As to the guy who mentioned Israel does not be waiting to grant an instantaneous and and instantaneous sufficient blow to Iran even however there is continued hypothesis right here and the unlikely-hood of an Israel attack- i might ask if everyone right here recollects the six day conflict ( yup talking approximately whilst Israel went to conflict with a extensive majority of the middle eastern states of -Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, and a variety of of alternative different states by using the middle east that supported the conflict against Israel- following the top effect of the conflict Israel gained fairly a lot of consistently disputed land which incorporate- Sinai, Gaza strip, Golan Heights, factors of Jersualem and the west financial business enterprise. One might wish the becoming escalations does not circulate so far to effect in an entire out conflict, yet finding lower back upon historic previous not sure if thats a probability Israel and Netanyahu are prepared to take once you have somone like Ahmadinejad in capability (the comparable guy who denied the holocaust ever happend and the comparable guy who promised to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, and the comparable guy who has yet to truly be met with any genuine or devastating sanctions via the U.S. or different international locations even however we've heard plenty rhetoric from the present admin. in this)
2016-12-11 08:17:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What if instead of both sides killing innocent people they try this. Some TV producer start a real reality show. Both sides pick their best fighter and fight to the death in area where everything is caught on video tape. All money raised is used to buy land in CA for Palestian Homeland. They might work cheaper than Mexicans.
2006-08-17 16:31:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mister2-15-2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
well i kinda agree with you, syria has no mone though, its all funded by iran, and since that saddam is out of power, iran is the most powerful in the middle eat, and if they do more, it could lead to nukes, and possibly a ww3 which would be totally political like iraq by the way
2006-08-13 17:49:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by chrismango13 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think that there is no good that will come out of this for anyone. I think that both nations have bitten off more than they can chew. The USA as well. I'm watching CNN coverage and it doesn't look very good from what I'm seeing.
2006-08-13 17:43:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree. GOOOOO IRAN AND SYRIA!
2006-08-13 17:38:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by corner of the morning 2
·
0⤊
4⤋