Or, which needs to be prevalent, if any.
2006-08-13 17:09:33 · 7 answers · asked by vim 5 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
regarding females emotion is prevalent. Males, logic( at least they like to think they are being logical lol) Logical thinking is more efficient. Although emotions are important, they impede logic therefore stifling efficiency. Intelligence is a plus when dealing with either logic or emotion, and can make a lot of difference in the processing of logical or emotional output.
I think there needs to be more logical thinking in the modern world. And if it's done intelligently even better.
2006-08-13 18:39:58 · answer #1 · answered by nikki sixx 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It all depends on the person and the situation, which will, and/or needs to be prevalent. Each has its value when the time is right.
2006-08-13 17:54:32 · answer #2 · answered by Arrow 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All what u mentioned and many other attributes prevalent together makes a person about half complete!
2006-08-13 17:14:09 · answer #3 · answered by chris 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From what I've learned over half a century, you can take logic, emotions and intelligence and throw them all in a black hole... INSTINCT is all you need. That, and the ability to trust it.
Without your instincts intact, neither intelligence, logic nor emotion serve anyone any good at all.
2006-08-13 17:21:33 · answer #4 · answered by joyfulpaints 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Uhm, no. you do not have any clue about the nature of the universe previous a constrained evaluation of human habit. in the first position, the sentiments that you spoke of are really immediately ahead to all social animals and in truth all human behaviors are considered for the era of all animals to various stages. the in uncomplicated words reason that our habit might want to be considered "god like" is because people have created gods and by no skill that a "god" or "gods" created people or something. It does no longer take intelligence to wreck earth or the existence on it, a minimum of four close to extinction activities have befell previous to people evolving. Granted, we've the responsibility of our negative movements, yet we've not approached the destruction of organic activities. No, you do no longer make any sense in any respect.
2016-11-24 23:53:29 · answer #5 · answered by merralee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
an equal balance of logic and emotion would make an intelligent world
2006-08-14 11:39:04 · answer #6 · answered by Cap'n Donna 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing is "Prevailant"
You are made up of MANY attributes.
Life is about BALANCE, not "Prevailance"
2006-08-13 17:19:38 · answer #7 · answered by James F 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋