English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-13 16:20:44 · 13 answers · asked by wisher1123 2 in Sports Other - Sports

13 answers

i wouldnt say any sport. but guys are better at most sports because they genetically have more muscle. gals are usually better at gymnastics and other sports that require great flexability.

2006-08-13 16:26:30 · answer #1 · answered by none 5 · 0 0

insofar as they are naturally stronger there is probably some truth to this yeah. That's why guys and girls are in different leagues. I also think that guys by nature tend to be more competitive.

also, just look at the times men and women have for varius events in the olympics. Men always lift more weight, run it faster, or do better than the female champion. The marathon victor is always a man. Maybe some people would like to believe men and women are athletically equal, but there is no way that this is actually true. sorry.

2006-08-13 23:26:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Some say they are, but girls can get better, and there are sports for guys, and sports for girls. Girls cant be good a guy sports and guys cant be good at girl sports.

2006-08-13 23:24:53 · answer #3 · answered by forever21_12 2 · 0 0

Unfortunatly in general guys a naturally better than girls at most sports. An average guy tends to be stronger than an average girl in most sports. There are a lot of theories and reasons why but the biggest one is because of how guys and girls are built differently. Whcih leads to guys tending to be stronger and faster than girls. Also most people believe guys are more competitive than girls driving them to train harder. But obviously a girl can train harder than anybody, guy or girl, if she wants to bad enoughand can be better than almost everybody.

2006-08-14 00:22:56 · answer #4 · answered by fairmonttrack4 2 · 0 0

Simply put----testosterone. Men are genetically inclined to be better at sports or athletics that women. This is a generalization, please don't compare Mia Hamm to Tom Arnold. Not to say women can't be good at sports but I'd bet that if you took 50 men and 50 women randomly and exposed them to different sports, the men would do better.

2006-08-13 23:43:04 · answer #5 · answered by TexMan98 2 · 0 0

i dont believe that for a second.... there isnt a male soccer team alive who could even hold ground with the ones mia hamm captained womens boxing is more fun and violent to watch than mens because the women fight more and run away from eachother less and i think diane taurossi(plz forgive me botching her name) could hold her own easilly in the NBA hell i know for a fact i couldnt last on the track with marion jones i guess the real answer is it depends on the individual not the group

2006-08-13 23:25:08 · answer #6 · answered by mr benis 3 · 0 0

yes, because of the testosterone.
but it depends in what sports, in chess, darts, and other sports that don't need force, the testosterone doesn't make a difference...

2006-08-14 09:20:43 · answer #7 · answered by Sir Alex 6 · 0 0

boys are way better at sports

2006-08-13 23:25:42 · answer #8 · answered by hockey pro 4 · 0 0

NO i don't think so i think that any 1 could be good at a sport naturly no matter what sex they are

2006-08-13 23:36:14 · answer #9 · answered by Kyle L 2 · 0 0

no i dont think so cause girls are smaller and kinda lighter than guys so they move fast mabye foot ball guys are better at.

2006-08-13 23:26:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers