Definitely one who loves only me and is plain. I have found that if you take the time to get to know the "plain" guys, you often find a diamond in the rough. My husband was not what you would call handsome but he wasn't butt ugly either. He didn't have a pile of money but he did have a good paying job and was responsible about paying his bills and taking care of his possessions. At first he came across and cold and awkward but after a few dates, he started to relax and his funny, witty personality came out. The more time I took to get to know him, the more pleasing qualities I found in him. I tell my female friends who are looking for a mate not to be so quick to write off the "plain" guys because hiding behind the "plain" cover just might be the right one for them. Precious gems, stones and ore has to be dug up out of plain dirt.
2006-08-13 14:52:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by livingstonseagull43 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
handsome .. that probably would only last until he got old and ugly..and rich.. only until I spent all the money so that would not last..
so for me the only answer for me would be the man who loves me..which if it were love ..then it would be life long..
and the plain man whom I was in love with would be handsome to me
anyways.. being capable all by myself- to attain wealth..
I could have it both ways anyways!
2006-08-13 14:41:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by staciesweet 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
A man who just loves me and is very plain
2006-08-13 14:34:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by goodbye 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't want a man who loves only me. I would want him to love his Mum, his children and Himself. I wouldn't want him to deny the possibility that someone might come along in 12 or 20 years that he might love. I would like to be loved as well, but not exclusively. Therefore, I would opt for the handsome rich man who loves all whom he encounters.
2006-08-13 14:36:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Heathery Lane 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
love makes the world go round......oh wait..... or is that money....? J/K
I would definitely go for a guy who loves me and is plain. People can always make money and I'm really fun so I would bring him out a little, but definitely a guy who loved me. If he was handsome, that wouldn't hurt.
2006-08-13 15:00:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by caramel_angelkiss 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Now why can't he be both! But alas, I have to say that I definitely would pick the one who loves me. And gladly I have such a wonderful person in my life. Although he has no money he is rich in love and I consider myself the luckiest person to have him. He could never be "plain" to me with his "rich" personality and soul. He taught me how to love and how to be a better person.
2006-08-13 14:41:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
just loves u only and is plain cause the rich man can be a basturd sum times
2006-08-13 14:35:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It doesn't matter if he's rich or not if he loves me then fine being plain isn't bad at all.The handsome & rich guy is stuck on himself any way.
2006-08-13 14:36:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by sugarbdp1 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'll take love and plain, unless the rich and handsome one loves me too, then I'll take him.
2006-08-13 14:35:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by jincr 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Love, yes, but not plain. I mean looks he can be plain, but not personality. I wouldn`t want to be with anyone who tries to be "normal". I love orginality and he has to stand out. He has to just break loose and have fun sometimes, without thinking of the consiquences. I could get bored easily will someone "plain." He has to be adventerous and tons of fun. I want him to love me, of course, but I want someone who I can tell my friends teriffic stories about, someone who sweeps me off my feet and takes me by surprise. Love is the most important thing, but without passion and adventure and some fun, I`d be bored with him. Of course, this is just me, I know friends who would rather have the whole quite, happy family thing, but its just not for me.
2006-08-13 16:02:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋