From my vague knowledge of the stock market, it seems that, when a person sells a tenth of a percent of a company's stock, they do not receive a tenth of a percent of the company's net worth, but rather whatever price others are willing to pay for the stock. If the price of a stock is determined only by the demand for the stock, what mechanism links this demand to the company's profits? It seems like people could just choose an arbitrary standard for valuation and cut profits out of the equation. The only thing I could think is that:
1) Higher profits decrease the chance of dissolution, in which case the stock becomes worthless,
2) Profits are an arbitrary standard, but a standard is needed so that is what people go with.
If #1 is the answer, then why this obsession with marginal changes in the profitability of companies (like Coca Cola) that clearly aren't going bankrupt any time soon?
2006-08-13
14:01:05
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Business & Finance
➔ Investing