Hopefully the means justify the end!
2006-08-13 12:40:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Wise ol' owl 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It depends on the "end" and the "means". A teleological approach to ethics is usually chosen as a rationale for taking a specific action. In short it is rhetoric to to justify the end. Assuming the end is "good", then the means however horrid is often justified by this argument.
2006-08-13 12:43:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Cary Grant 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Depends. Bad action to justify a good result. NO.
Good action to justify a bad result. NO
Good action to justify a good result. YES..
2006-08-13 12:40:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ya-sai 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not for me. I'm a process type of guy.
This is why I love America. It's all about the process, whether it be the constitution or pursuit of happiness. It's all about the process.
2006-08-13 12:40:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by dizneeland 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
For what?
I do in some cases. In others, no it does not.
I think you need to give a hypothetical situation or something that has happened before and then ask that question. I could definitely tell you then.
2006-08-13 13:02:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
You can only use this statement in relation to SOMETHING. You can't weigh up pros and cons of a situation that you know nothing about. So tell us already what you're talking about.
2006-08-13 12:41:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bapboy 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
THAT question always requires conditions, parameters, ifs, ands, buts, and maybes... Additional details... As the question stands, not always...
2006-08-13 12:41:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by KnowhereMan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. If I did, that would make me a liberal in the modern sense of the word, wouldn't it?
2006-08-13 12:41:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by jonny c 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on the "means" you are trying to achieve.
2006-08-13 13:04:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by scruffycat 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
never. the process must have integrity
2006-08-13 12:43:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by tinkerbella 5
·
1⤊
0⤋