I know that with a reverse chronological resume you are supposed to put your most recent work activity first. However, I'm in a tricky situation.
I worked at Job 1 from Aug-Nov 2004 and then again from May - Aug 2006. I worked at Job 2 May - Aug 2006 (yes, two jobs at the same time). I worked at Job 3 Jan 2005 - April 2006. I am now applying for a new job.
The job I'm applying for is totally unrelated to Job 1, but highly related to Jobs 2 & 3. I would like to list them in this order:
Job 2
May 2006 - August 2006
Job 3
Jan 2005 - April 2006
Job 1
August 2004 - November 2004 and May 2006 - August 2006
I want to put them in this order because it puts the most relevant experience first. However, it breaks from reverse chronological format. Do you think that's okay? The alternative would be to simply leave out the fact that I am currently working at Job 1 again.
Thoughts?
Thanks!
2006-08-13
09:29:42
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Business & Finance
➔ Careers & Employment