I put in an answer to part 1, but like u I am revisiting. U were obviously not happy with what u read.Neither am I . If women had full control and authority over the entire world and men were 2nd citizens then I'm afraid the truth is that everything will retard seriously. Firstly vehicles will be banned.Sex b4 marriage will be banned.Criminals will be sent to a holiday island.Sex within marriage will be limited to once a year. Drinking more than 2 units will get u into serious trouble.Salad will be the main food. Anyone who argues with all this will have that 1 cut off and displayed at a prominent place. Enjoy!
2006-08-13 10:02:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have a hard time imagining what the world would be like
if our political system produced primarily women candidates.
The reason is unfortunate: The stereotypical personality
traits that make women different from men, also make them
less fiercely ambitious.
Women in politics now have to set asside a lot of their
consensus building skills to simply survive with the all-important
vote.
I suppose you could change your question to specify that
men couldn't vote - and perhaps some of these traits would
begin to emerge.
Would such a world have a domestic sub-class of women?
Would it be replaced by men? Would differences between
religions be more profound than the difference between
genders?
Are women capable of being as overbearing towards
men as they could be to women?
Absolute power corrupts absolutely. You betcha.
I think the United States is going the right direction - but not
fast enough. Given a reasonable mix of women and men
in politics, some of those skills may start to emerge anyways.
2006-08-13 09:28:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Elana 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well...women won't run the world.. That could be good and bad.
There is a good and bad side to this. The fear is in America, someone being too soft. I believe a woman with a great outlook on America, who isn't soft, who served in the military, and has a great, all-around knowledge of politics would be what America needs.
I actually look forward to that day.
But in Muslim communities, women are for reproduction and house and farming work only.. It'd be a miracle if they somehow found their way into office.
I believe a lot of people could learn from it. That is, if performed properly.
I'm for it, but if push comes to shove-- and the theory becomes invalid, than, it's back to the war of the worlds...
Note: Our lady President can't have blonde moments every 12 seconds like Hilary...
But you have to think.. mens rights would decrease hardcore, and women would own the law.. Which is kind of scarry...
--Rob :)
2006-08-13 09:26:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by stealth_n700ms 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If GIRLS ruled the world, it would be utter chaos.
If WOMEN ruled the world, things would be somewhat more sane.
And don't point to PMS, guys! That's only a few days out of the month. Our testosterone screws with our brains from puberty until death, 24/7/365.
2006-08-13 09:20:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bostonian In MO 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
People should get elected to office because they are right for the job, not because they are male or female. I'm tired of hearing that women should have special privileges just because they're women. If you're not qualified or experienced, you don't get the job! Men have to live by this rule, women should too. Fair is fair.
2006-08-13 09:26:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Margret Thatcher went to war over a rock in the Atlantic Ocean populated by sheep and penguins. Do you really think that women would do a better job?
2006-08-13 09:14:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think it would be better if women ruled the world because there'd be no high levels of testosterone flying around and none of this "my gun's bigger than yours" rubbish.
we'd discuss world matters over tea and nail painting and when the woman leader of 1 country says she'll support the woman leader of another country you know she'd mean it and go all out 4 her.
after all everyone knows women are much better at handling difficult situations and multitasking and would be much more sensitive to the other country's needs.
women all the way!!!!
2006-08-13 09:19:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Neither....no my cat will rule the world. Everyday when I think he is sleeping he is really meditating and thinking up a plot on how to take of the world. Yeah....he took the job from Pinky and the Brain, he ate them a live. Sorry guys.
2006-08-13 09:16:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by HappyCat 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think women have more important things to do than rule the world!
2006-08-13 09:25:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Luvfactory 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I actually think it would be women, they are more tolerent of others ideas and are much better at planning and they always look for the non violent way of solving a problem before using violence.
2006-08-13 09:22:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by region50 6
·
0⤊
0⤋