can any one explain to me why tatanka,flair,hogan,jeff jarret,sting, steiner,booker T are still wrestling not so much wwe but tna has so much talnet there not using its so stupid they think people are gonna pay to watch Jarret vs Sting more then they would Styles vs Sabin in a ladder match its B.S that they think that its a better match. im so sick of watching tatanka getting beat like a goverment mule every thurseday sry friday im canadain. wtf r they thinking
why is a young talented guy like orton wrestling a guy, who if hit to hard will littarly break into dust. at summerslam it blows my mind i know that there desperate for ratings but my god give it up spend your money to bring back tajri or some other actually talented guys. if they took half of the money there paying hogan and offerd it to samoa joe he'd come a running. i know i would
2006-08-13 09:06:07 · 6 answers · asked by Jared 2 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
first of all let me say that orton has lost some of his talent and needs to lay off the drugs (weed and steroids, both of which he has been caught with or tested positive for), then the wwe might see it more fit to give him some wins. my fave wrestler of all time is sting, i'm glad they have him at tna. and people love seeing their old favorites come back, besides, it's helping guys like hogan promote his show and his daughter's new album. it's not like orton is really interested in brooke, he's engaged to long time girlfriend samantha.
2006-08-13 09:21:26 · answer #1 · answered by bored_ass_little_girl 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
in case you particularly like wrestling and also you watch it for the skills that are on show than TNA is your form. I actually were watching TNA because the starting up once you ought to in hardship-free words watch it on PPV. And believe me i used to show screen the WWE, yet after I stumbled on TNA i finished watching the WWE. The WWE is about stupid gimmicks and characters. at the same time as i began watching TNA i noted strikes that wrestlers contained in the WWE ought to under no circumstances do or ought to even attempt, except for perhaps Jeff Hardy. They were all there to show their skills. in case you adult men who hate on TNA a lot ought to offer TNA a shot you spot stuff that you've under no circumstances considered on the WWE. Even their women human beings's branch is extra effective than the WWE's. i comprehend the WWE has a lengthy cult following and TNA has their artwork cut back out for them, yet when all those WWE followers ought to easily take off their blinders and get the undesirable gimmick and plot line style out of their mouths they'll see that TNA is the position its at!
2016-11-30 01:17:13 · answer #2 · answered by goldie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They schedule the younger wrestlers against the legends to give them more name recognition. It's called a 'push'...for example, Hogan is widely regarded as having 'saved' wrestling. If Randy Orton beats him, it IMMEDIATELY gives Orton more credibility, even though Randy comes from legends himself. A very famous 'push' was when Sean Waltman (123 Kid) supposedly came from the audience to beat Scott Hall (Razor Ramon).
2006-08-13 09:18:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
becuase hulkamania is running wild!
and jarret loves his job and people love sting. people will pay to see sting even if he's getting his *** kicked.
somoa joe has stated several times he'll never work for vince mcmahn. he's not a mcmahn wrestler. he's not gay.
2006-08-13 09:25:02 · answer #4 · answered by ballistik696 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
whoa u wrote a lot i don't feel like reading sorry..but old guys used to USED TO wresltle really well!1
2006-08-13 11:03:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because they are legends or future like hulk hogan and the undertaker.
2006-08-13 09:09:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋