English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

just today they continued to throw rockets onto civilian cities in israel 160 of them killing an injuring civilians.. so do you think israel should just sit and wait for america o do somehing

2006-08-13 09:04:54 · 19 answers · asked by lisa12345 1 in News & Events Current Events

19 answers

If they keep on sending rockets, Israel will keep on beating the *hit out of them

2006-08-13 11:46:06 · answer #1 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0 0

They shouldn't Hezbollah is nothing more than a very useful tool for Iran and Syria. Hezbollah is a terrorist organization, I'm so p*ssed that Lebanon supports them Hezbollah has just as much control as the Lebanese gov and Lebanon is too afraid to stand up and dismount them instead they call them heroes. This is done while Hezbollah cowers behind civilains. If I were Israel I'd finish Hezbollah as the dang ceasefire will do is give Hezbollah a chance to recover and become more powerful. I'd also take no BS from Iran and eliminate anything I thought could be used to create WMD's. Syria is also screwed they need to do something but like many of the countries in that area they are controlled by radical muslim terrorist, who control alot of the muslims and most of the mideast countries are muslims. If Israel decides not to anihilate Hezbollah then we should disarm them and put a international peace keeping force there.

2006-08-13 09:35:17 · answer #2 · answered by Jonathan S 2 · 1 0

There are NO "civilian cities" in Israel. All Iraelis are armed. 99% choose to go live on a strip of land they are aware was stolen from Arabs in 1948 by the British. That doesn't make Hezbollah blameless, but it does mean I shouldn't waste any sleep over anything that happens in Israel.

2006-08-13 09:14:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Don't you know Where was Israel sanding it's Rockets? Israel also killed civilians not any terrorist. It's killed babies and women who don't belong to Hezbollah. Don't ever try to preach Israel is the God's Town to the world. Where ever good human live there will be god.

2006-08-13 09:14:30 · answer #4 · answered by mswathi1025 4 · 0 0

Israel has shown definate restraint. They could have come in with their whole army but they have not. They have also warned every area they bombed or attacked before they have gone in.
Today Hezzbollah bombed Israel with over 250 rockets. I don't think that Israel should seize fire.

2006-08-13 09:11:37 · answer #5 · answered by rltouhe 6 · 0 0

well u're talking about sending rockets into civilians cities.. i just wanna tell u that i wish that israel is just sending rockets into lebanon..but no israel is just killing daily 40 lebanese innocents.. u've killed 1200 lebanese..against just 125 israeli and mostly of soldiers.. and to be more specific just now 10 minutes ago israel have killed 7 families in the south of lebanon..that's mean at least 35 died in 3 secondes.. and in the other side.. i hope that this war continue.. coz if it took just 15 day more..believe me it's gonna begin the end of israel.. and u know what's happening in israel.. Maybe u should just read the Haaretz.. it's ok if u destroyed our country and killed our child.. but that's ur end my dear.. coz the one who kill UN soldiers and Red Cross members would kill children and women..i really hope that there's no a cease fire tommorrow..coz u'r going down men..down down down..

2006-08-13 10:53:24 · answer #6 · answered by elaj 1 · 0 0

hezbollah did not hearth the rockets hezbollah is prevalent for taking duty for his or her movements and that i think of it replaced into hassan nasrallah or a spoksman of hezbollah pronounced " we are actually not frightened of you'z (israel) yet we did not hearth any rockets to you" and hezbollah wont attack israel till israel assaults first like the conflict in 2006

2016-10-02 00:56:52 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Well, that's part of the issue. Hezbolla refuses to remove troops even if UN troops arrive, and they refuse to leave the northern border of Israel at all. Even if the UN really does work out a ceasefire, Hebollah has made it pretty clear they won't withdraw.

2006-08-13 09:09:02 · answer #8 · answered by tsopolly 6 · 1 0

They shouldn't ,plain Hezbollah need to be destroy just as Bush say we are at War with Terror and ANY state that support them and even the Democrat know this=====Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 | Source

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 | Source

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 | Source

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 | Source

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 | Source

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 | Source
And they was many more but now everyone think we are wrong..We should stand with Israel.KATTY OVERCASH

2006-08-13 09:26:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because they are temporarily appearing to listen to public(world and U.N.)opinion.Hezbollah will not reciprocate,they will not hold up their end of a cease fire or any other peaceful arrangement because it would'nt serve their purpose, and Israel knows this.

2006-08-13 09:28:04 · answer #10 · answered by tiger_x76 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers