English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For all of you out there that were dupped into believing the lies in that movie.....Heres the rebuttle
http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/lcg2.html#Engine%20rotor%20mystery?

2006-08-13 08:48:34 · 22 answers · asked by quarterback 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

22 answers

Here's a link to an article in Popular Mechanics, an entirely non-political source, that shows just how absurd the conspiracy theories are.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=4

And here's a link to an article at Salon.com, a Liberal site, that also argues against what it calls the 9/11 deniers. It specifically rips apart "Loose Change".

http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/2006/06/27/911_conspiracies/index_np.html

2006-08-13 09:10:14 · answer #1 · answered by Jay S 5 · 2 4

How many times you going to post this same "question"?

You with the government or something?

Why is it so importaint to you to make people believe Loose Change is bad? Is there a reason you don't want people to see it?

I mean, if the video is so terrible people would learn that themselves when they watch it.

Go ahead people, watch the video and then read the rebuttal. Then decide for yourself.

THINK FOR YOURSELF!

What good is a rebuttal without know the other side of the argument?

Don't take one person's word for it. Don't take anyone's word for it.

There are alot of trueths in Loose Change. And maybe some treuths in the rebuttal.

Watch the Video, read the Rebuttal and then decide for yourself.

Don't take this guys word for it, or mine.

THINK FOR YOUSELF!

2006-08-14 19:44:39 · answer #2 · answered by My Two Cents 2 · 0 0

yeah there are some ridiculous theories and some get taken too far ... but the bottom line is ::::: no plane wreckage at 2 crash sites ... building7 fell for no reason ... and osama is a CIA trained operative ...and the most advanced military and early warning system in the world failed to respond to the attacks for how long while they were happening? They can rebutt all they want to there is too many holes in the official explanation .... or should i say justification to set up a military base in the middle east .... we are being lied to and if you believe everything you hear on the tv ur the epitome of a gullible person ... you want to support your country fine .... but dont try to make a case that there wasnt govt involvement in 911 and the 7/7 bombings in london.

2006-08-13 09:02:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I dont know what kind of sane people would not believe in logic.

The facts placed before us in loose change are quite solid. Many of the people who answered this question are ur regular Zombies who have want us to believe that loose change has something wrong in it. there are abut ten ans to this question but not one has any facts to convince us.

I dont think any of u have any logical facts to prove ur point. Loose change team has done some reall hardwork. They have comeup with many facts which are logical and which need to be answere in a logical and sane manner. Dont just go around and thru this hardwork in to the garbage can.

I've read the links above which claim to ans the questions raised by the loose change. They critisims given in these pages is childish. Solid facts need solid ans not some "teenageer replies" and rebutes. If u have the facts come forward. If u dont then stop rebuting the people who want the truth to come out.

2006-08-13 09:26:55 · answer #4 · answered by gndirkds 2 · 2 2

It is far more plausible than the "official version" !

They are the Illuminatis, and they own you,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :

And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the Untied Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

2006-08-13 09:04:08 · answer #5 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 2 6

If its that movie about how the government supposivly "attacked" us, then yeah its some serious bullshit.

Just the fact that it is still online proves the government didn't do it.

If they had, all the kids that made the movie would have been dead within hours. Then the whole thing swept under the carpet.

They are all still alive.

2006-08-13 08:52:59 · answer #6 · answered by Justin 3 · 2 1

It is a film BASED on true events. A bit like Braveheart, not to be taken as historically correct.

2006-08-13 08:54:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A. Yes, I know how ridiculous "Loose Change is.
B. It's spelled "duped".

2006-08-13 08:55:11 · answer #8 · answered by Cybeq 5 · 2 0

no i don't HE is an open minded person who looks at both
sides of the story. USA is murdering innocent IRAQIZ for oil so why shouldn't Iraqz fight back . YOU BETTER realize the fuckin' meaning of WAR: Both opponents suffer.
So either pull out or Dance to the music!.

Snoodles I thought it was just the name but you do have noodles for brains

2006-08-13 08:57:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I don't have to see it to know it. The conspiracists think it was handed down from on high. That tells you how ridiculous it is.

2006-08-13 08:52:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers