I'm looking for people's grasp of the age-old ("archetypal") componentials that may be seen as "formative" in the creation of our reasoning capacities. What aspects of the mind's functionality can you name, e.g., long-term & short-term memory [ROM & RAM, respectively]?
By viewing these within a matrix of develpomental indicies. we can come to better appreciate the unique "person-space" signatures each of us occupies... and I dare say, become a LOT more forgiving of our shared imperfections... when a person acts or behaves a certain way, there are always REASONS that point back to the developmmental indicies of their "skill sets."
2006-08-13 08:45:30 · 2 answers · asked by cherodman4u 4 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
In spite of my doubts about the philosophical sophistication of Gigerenzer's work, his project has the potential to become a truly revolutionary approach to rationality. Gigerenzer is not alone in urging us to take seriously the adaptive nature of human reasoning, but he is one of the few who has the courage to envisage an entire new framework. He argues persuasively that we should be looking for normative standards of human reasoning that are shaped by the relation between the mind and the environment, and reflect the only kind of rationality that matters to us, the rationality that allows limited systems to control a complex and ever-changing world. What these standards exactly are, and why they play a normative role, are questions yet to be answered.
Good site will answer all and then some:-)
2006-08-13 09:34:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are social animals
2006-08-17 12:45:09 · answer #2 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋