2006-08-13 07:34:31 · 18 answers · asked by ggarsk 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Caging lists
Dropping voters of the rolls for no reason
Refusing to bring to vote in the House requiring all electronic voting machines have a varifible paper trail
Refusing to bring to vote in the Senate a bill to make being a campaign chairperson ineligable to oversee the states voting.
Not having enough voting machines in predomitlay Democratic precients.
Not counting provinsional ballots as required by law.
Locking down counting stations and not letting the counts be watched by independent observers.
Certifying preceints that have 200% voter turn out and it's amazing all those went to Bush.
2006-08-13 08:00:46 · update #1
Because without cheating, they would not have had a Republican president in the White House for the last two terms!
2006-08-13 07:40:48 · answer #1 · answered by Brian C 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If Dems had picked a moderate candidate in 04 (such as Liberman) instead of a Left wing nut like Kerry, they wouldn't have lost. Somehow, I have a feeling History will repeat itself in 08. Just look what the Dems did to Liberman in Conneticut.
2006-08-13 07:42:54 · answer #2 · answered by HokiePaul 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Democrats define honest as having illegal immigrants casting votes and also trying to count a dimple on a ballot as a vote.
2006-08-13 07:40:13 · answer #3 · answered by remmo16 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah right. We've won the last 2 elections with out intercepting the satellite relays like Clinton did to beat G. Bush senior. No, you liberals need to stop destroying America because we don't believe your lies. How about backing up your lies with some proof. Not possible is it? I hope your not offended but i think your a fool.
2006-08-13 07:50:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you mean Democrats? Like how they're opposed to one person, one vote as demonstrated by opposition to any sort of proof of identification for voters. This couldn't possibly be because they rely on the votes of dead people and busing people around to vote multiple times, could it?
2006-08-13 07:40:35 · answer #5 · answered by dizneeland 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do the damnocrats still have dead people voting for them and every election a damnocrat looses (which has been a lot lately) want a re-count no matter the margin of defeat!!!
2006-08-13 07:39:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'll say nothing for your blatant misunderstanding of current political affairs, but there is an element of your ignorance that I feel that I must remedy: To say that I was a liberal democrat is like saying that McCarthy was a commie. (not that you aren't partial to Marxist idealism) While I followed a liberal platform for my time period, the brand of liberalism to which I was subscribed was based on the enlightenment concept that while man requires liberty, he is still governed by many societal institutions- religion being one of them. You, horsefucker, are a product of "sentimental" liberalism, the ideal of which is total license.
2006-08-14 14:17:55 · answer #7 · answered by Thomas Jefferson 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are frightened that the Dems learned from Repubs how to do it. In 2000 and again in 2004 the Repubs made a science out of it, both in Florida and in Ohio.
2006-08-13 07:43:08 · answer #8 · answered by bigjohn B 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We aren't afraid, We won in spite of the BS the democrats pulled in the last two elections.
2006-08-13 07:39:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because Bush hasn't and never will go anything right. He is a loser, a liar, a warmonger, and a criminal. Repubs should be afraid, very afraid. Anyone with even half a brain should see that.
2006-08-13 07:40:51 · answer #10 · answered by shirley e 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋