English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If I were a celebrity I would be on this thing all the time because we are all just having fun and nobody would know who they really are so they could have fun and not be judged by the public and have to worry about what they said , and who they actually said it to! Just a thought!

2006-08-13 06:32:04 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

5 answers

You missed it, but back in June, yahoo answers featured questions posed by celebrities such as Bono and Ariana Huffington, as well Al Gore and Stephen Hawking. This was done to generate interest in this site I am sure, but was pretty cool, nonetheless.

As for daily use, there might be some, but I am thinking not too many. I think the demands on their time, the danger of some tabloid fidning out their account name, and the sheer volume of content about themselves would be a turn off.

Do you really expect Paris Hilton to want to read the crap about her on this site?

2006-08-13 09:27:48 · answer #1 · answered by But why is the rum always gone? 6 · 0 0

they are issues that could basically be found after hundreds and hundreds of trials. and of direction, strict limit ought to be in place. besides the undeniable fact that, via fact the muse of technology is often changing via new discoveries, we could even have sympathy to the drug business enterprise to boot. they do no longer look to be miracle makers, they only attempt to make salary by utilising merchandising some thing that they "think of" would help individuals. think of the worldwide with out antibiotics and different drugs, what proportion people would could die? If we agree that technology can get replaced, the drug business enterprise would possibly no longer have an excuse of increasing drugs expenditures via fact of regulation greater wholesome.additionally if we seem on the different section that has used the socialist device it has slowed down and did no longer stay as much as its Utopian promise. No device is suitable yet open and unfastened marketplace is the suitable available.

2016-11-04 12:09:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As much as we think they would like too, probably not. They just don't have the time to themselves.

2006-08-13 06:37:20 · answer #3 · answered by houstonmom77064 3 · 0 0

I think they have better things to do with their time.

2006-08-13 06:37:11 · answer #4 · answered by Bride2Be 8/30/08 5 · 0 1

Honestly...why would they? They're frickin' rich and famous. They have lives...lol.

2006-08-13 06:38:26 · answer #5 · answered by :) 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers