Neither one! Can you imagine a female president with a control issue? Think about it "I am extremely irritable today, let's start a war!" " He said what about my clothes? Watch this!" Females are more vengeful and frightening then males when they are pissed off. "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned!" Seriously.
I know, I'm a woman!
2006-08-13 06:06:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Amy A 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Do you think we are ready for a woman president ? Either, would be a good leader. Where Hillary has experience on the home front, Condi. has helped to make headway in foreign affairs. Hillary has shown strength in her family matters . Condi. has not even acknowledged having a family. Good leader qualities , I guess.! Claudia
2006-08-13 06:17:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by crarcher63 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't trust Hillary because of her willingness to sway with the political winds; which inevitably cause her to compromise what her constituency hired her to stand up for.
I definitely don't trust Condi, because she is a Corporate Puppet...just like BOOsh. She is one of the Iraq War's architects, and would be a horrible representative for the American People to the world.
Both would use the position to boost their own image and would let all of that power go to their heads. I would vote independent if this became my choice.
Otherwise, if female write-in candidates were the only other option; I'd write in either Senator Barbara Boxer, Ambassador Carol Mosely-Braun or even Arianna Huffington. Though, Boxer would be my first choice, above all.
2006-08-13 06:15:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Daniel C 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Most dems agree that Hillary is not the best candidate and will be worse than Bill. Condi doesn't wanna run but I would vote for her because she would be the best person for the job between the two.
Wouldn't it be amazing if the first black president was not only a woman... but a republican? LOL
2006-08-13 06:05:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Neal 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
nicely judging with the help of the shown actuality that you do not even recognize Keyes' first call is Alan no longer Alex shows how influential he's. Condi Rice has no longer carried out an particularly reliable job as secretary of state imo. now to not prepare if republicans favor to win they could fullyyt separate themselves from all issues Bush. I doubt even which will be adequate.
2016-11-24 23:07:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Condi
2006-08-13 06:06:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kiki Joy 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Condi. I agree with you 100% in that she has proven herself more that Hillary who has Senate aides telling her what to do and say to look good for the cameras
2006-08-13 06:03:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Condi. Too bad she's not running though. I bet she would beat hillary
2006-08-13 12:18:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would feel safe with condi. I hope she runs because I would be first in line voting!
2006-08-13 06:18:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither. But if I had to choose, I'd choose Hillary, as Condi appears to be a tool. She doesn't know how to be unbiassed in international affairs and just repeats the same stuff over and over again on the media. I don't know if Hillary would be better, but I think we've had enough republican carnage for a while.
2006-08-13 06:08:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Syed H 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
Either of them would be a liability for their respective parties: Hillary because she is too outspoken and doesn't have enough broad support in all parts of the country (as her husband Bill did) and Dr. Condoleezza Rice because she is an African-American who does not have whole-hearted support from persons in her own ethnic community.
I agree that it would be a breath of fresh air to see two strong, intelligent and capable women like this running for President one day. Sad to say, the country is STILL not ready for a woman to fill that office.
2006-08-13 06:08:01
·
answer #11
·
answered by Trace Element 2
·
0⤊
2⤋