Bush said Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11?

Question

But republicans keep saying we had to invade Iraq because of 9/11,,
But Iraq had nothing to do with it,
Why don’t they just admit Bush was lying about the war in Iraq and stop posturing that they are saving the world while they keep killing people that had nothing to do with 9/11.
Lets get out of Iraq and start hunting the real terrorist ,like the ones that where arrested in England and Pakistan.
Do You execute the wrong man just to satisfy a need for revenge?
We know their pride keeps them from admitting the truth, BUT
Have republicans lost all sense of Honesty

Answer 1

Ok. Relax. First of all, you have no control over the war or Bush. Second of all, there's probably a lot going on politically that the general public does not know about; so, don't think that you have the absolute truth and know all of the correct answers. And lastly, if you condemn all republicans, you're doing the same thing you're accusing Bush of doing- You're pretty much saying that he's stereotyping all middle eastern countries into the terrorist category and you're grouping all republicans into being just like Bush. For the record, I'm not a republican or a Bush supporter... I just find your logic to be flawed.

Answer 2

Bush did not lie about the war. He never said Saddam had anything to do with 9/11. We are hunting the terrorist all over the world. That just does not get the press and push the liberal left agenda like Iraq does. I have not lost any sense of honesty and I am offended at your accusation. You are a misguided little gnome, who have been fed a load of crap and you believe it.
You are the fool.

Answer 3

Yes Bush didn't directly say Iraq was involved in 9/11. He implied in all of his speech's tho. Tying 9/11, Saddam and Al Quada together as if they were one. But he did lie about the reasons for going to war. WMD's, when that falsehood was exposed it was to overthrow an evil dictator. The reasoning's has changed several times as new facts have come out.
As for Congress voting to go to war, THEY DID NOT VOTE TO GO TO WAR AGAINST IRAQ! They gave Bush authorization to us force if Saddam didn't comply with UN resolution 1440. Saddam was in the process of complying when Bush ordered the invasion. In fact the weapons inspectors said that if they had a few more weeks they could prove whether Saddam had WMD's or not. Also the UN several weeks later had to go back and change the resolution so the US invasion was legal.

Answer 4

We are going after terrorist organizations all over the world as we speak. Iraq war has it's flaws... sure. But, You liberals need to get over your hatred for Bush cause in 2008 when He is no longer in office... Who will You blame? Always gotta blame somebody for something... Both houses voted to go to war in Iraq so I am not gonna waste my time explaining this again to you people. Stop being a cry baby and if you wanna help then run for office or join the military... or just sit back and let us handle it for you... either way you will not survive on your own... You consistently prove this on a regular basis via health care, well fare...etc.

Answer 5

They're not saving the world, more people die in Iraq per day now then when Saddam was in charge...
The one's responsible (Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden, with a little help from Bush's negligence) Bush "doesn't even think about them that much anymore>"

Answer 6

I trust you and imagine that we would want to continually under no circumstances have gone into Iraq (I stated that as quickly because it become purely posturing with the aid of Bush & Co.) regrettably, the republicans are partly proper that if we purely pull out immediately, it received't in hardship-free words completely destabilize some thing of Iraq, in spite of the undeniable fact that it ought to also be considered as a victory for Al-Quaeda and associates. What extremely needs to take position is Bush & Co. removed from ability and someone with international status take delivery of the presidency (or a minimum of with particularly diplomatic skills) to convey the international community extra totally into Iraq. this manner we may be able to scale back our presence which could have a crucial outcome. that is going to no longer be American occupiers that those human beings are combating, that is going to likely be a international community (with any success consisting of many Arab countries) it is attempting to proper fix the country.

Answer 7

you are right that neither had anything to do with it. Sodamninsane though did support terrorist and their aims such as the destruction of the west and that is all that needed to be said. Trying to come up with reason enough to satisfy everyone is ridiculous.

Next stop IRAN - I say we should fire bomb their 5 largest cities. Kill everyone in them and flatten all infrastructure. Give them 2 days for unconditional surrender then fire bomb the next. Continue until done.

Answer 8

Iraq conflict was started for control of oil. America is great for invading countries and installing governments that are sympathetic to our oil wants. Bush, or the people who advised him, horribly wanted public support for their "war on terror" and greed for oil. After we were locked in to that one, then they can say, "Oops! We goofed." Too late to pull out without turning that country into utter chaos now.

Answer 9

Bush needed some genuine reason to invade Iraq as "that man tried to kill my daddy."

Bush and his cronies have no real idea of what it is they are doing.

Answer 10

What did you get your facts from a roll of toilet paper.....