Would you be saying that if one of your close relatives died in an aircraft that was downed by terrorists?
2006-08-13 05:33:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by JeffE 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lol, a new word for Bush....lol....ok, seriously :
They are the Illuminatis, and they own you,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :
And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the Untied Nations Business Council in September 1994
"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)
It is pretty easy, since the Begining...
2006-08-13 06:46:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Patriot 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This whole thing just annoys me in general. May I just point out that they have arrested all the supposed suspects, meaning that we are reasonably safe, yet we have the precautionary security arrangements. This strikes me as locking the stable door after the horse has bolted.
I flew back from America last week and the security was non-existent. When I got home I found nail clippers and tweezers in my hand luggage, which I must have put in there by mistake, yet no one detected them.
What really annoys me however, is the idiocy of these new rules. Have you ever sat through an 8 hour flight with nothing to do except read the in-flight magazine or watch ancient movies?
Of course Tony won't cut his holiday short. He is a self-obsessed idiot. It doesn't affect him does it? He gets a private jet at our expense.
As for George. My mother-in-law informed me that he apparently has a degree from Yale. Scary thought...
2006-08-13 05:38:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Libby 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some suggest that there are lots of similar terrorism-related investigations, most of which go largely unreported in the media, but some get publicised and exaggerated when it's politically convenient.
Blair and Labour are struggling, so some scaremongering would be well timed to make people too afraid to give the Tory-boy a chance.
Or it might all be legitimate, and your whinings might be the hollow cries of someone determined to perceive everything that ever happens as in some way indicative of a government's corruption.
For me, the truth is somewhere between the two scenarios.
But leaning more towards you convincing yourself of whatever you want to believe.
2006-08-13 05:33:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Wax Crayon 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
True, it's more than coincidence that the "terror alerts" only became public on the 1st August in the UK. Our leaders say they have been investigating this "plot" for months, and were obviously waiting for the "right time" to pounce ie. just before the mid term elections in the USA.
If there was a "Critical" level of danger to the public, then it would be reasonable to expect the "terrorists" to use their explosive somewhere else on the transport system of the UK.
As we saw, it was only the airports that were being "defended"
Also the police weren't making any controlled explosions at the suspected "terrorists houses"
The only effect that these "terror alerts" have, is to publicly announce to the "terrorists" when there are more police on duty,
And to scare some people enough to blindly follow their War(mongering) President / Prime minster
I smell a rat, and no-one should beleive any "intelligence" provided by our governments.
2006-08-13 05:30:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
That's Tony Blair all over. Always fiddles while Rome burns. Very reminiscent of the same blind insouciance expressed by one of his predecessors, James Callaghan, during the winter of discontent in 1978-79. Spent time in Guadeloupe while Britain was in chaos. Typical Labour: Sod you Jack, I'm alright".
2006-08-13 05:51:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by TrueBrit 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only scare is people like you get a life if you have ever been in a terror situation you would want to know whats coming not find out after the event . time to grow up and forget the BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU syndrome and try to live a little who know's you could be next??
2006-08-13 05:43:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by billywiz 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah i agree.
I mean Blair would have known about the investigation (arrests of suspected terrorists) but he still boarded a plane and went on holiday and never even came back early. Oh well with a bit of luck they might cancel all flights leaving the Caribbean and leave him there?
I definitely smell a huge rat!
2006-08-13 05:34:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by loopy lou 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Dems will use something to scare electorate into vote casting for their party yet none of it is working. they have not have been given any substance, basically smoke and mirrors. Bush surely stopped terror threats. Obama welcomes them.
2016-11-04 12:06:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
you are in serious need of medical help,these threats are real and to suggest they are political just shows how stupid some people are.
i suppose 9/11 and the bombs in london which are both disgraceful terror acts killing innocent people where planned also for political gain.
get a life you idiot
mike
2006-08-13 06:20:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by listener06y 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you're wrong....I think Blair was sent abroad so he could be better protected and George Bush was up on Air Force One which is where he goes when the **** hits the fan....real threat I think.
2006-08-13 05:35:41
·
answer #11
·
answered by dogfisheggcase421 4
·
0⤊
0⤋