English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

of course not, but sooner or later everybody in the world 'll know either through his people who 'll probably announce for there new leader, or through spy work.....

2006-08-13 05:31:52 · answer #1 · answered by Tota 2 · 0 0

Would Bush ever tell us?

Isama bin Laden has been a blank-check to this administration and a get-out-of-jail-free card from the opening gate. We have something called "the Patriot Act" that pretty much effectively and quietly ends democracy as we've known it since 1776. With hardly a whimper.

Bin Laden is a boogeyman who allows Bush to enslave us and abuse his powers worse than Caligula ever dreamed of. Even things that make no sense at all can be gotten just by saying his name, waving a flag, and using the words "patriotism" or "freedom." Like, "We need to stay the course in Iraq," even though every minute we remain there, they're having a civil war and they're far more unstable and insecure than what they even were under Hussein, very possibly ever worse than they were under Hussein. Why did we ever go there and for the love of God why are we staying? Because George waved a flag, said "freedom" and "patriotism" in conjunction with "axis of evil," "weapons of mass destruction," and "9/11." We'd follow him straight to Hell for that, and we not only have, but we're staying. Gladly.

Now it's known that Hussein shared no culpability in 9/11, there were no WMDs, and Iraq did not threaten the US in any way, shape, or form, nor would they have. And nobody even really gives a sh!t at all. But none of that matters as long as some pinhead is still waving a flag and reciting his stale old mantras.

The Emperor has no clothes and he will not tell us when Isama bin Laden dies, if he hasn't already.

Not until they can build a better boogeyman. Just wait. We'll have another 9/11, and probably even worse than the last. We were too busy with Iraq to much really give a sh!t.

That's the trouble. No matter how wrong it is, or what a silly, stupid, deadly little farce it is, or how many times it happens, or how bad, nobody really gives a sh!t.

2006-08-13 06:02:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Possibly Ben Laden is a Prince of the House of Saud. Most likely he would get a Royal funeral.

The Bush family has a long standing relationship with King Fahd Bin Abdul Aziz, So someone from the family (like George Hubert Walker Bush) would most likely be present.

It would be a sad day Ben Laden has done more for American business than anyone since Hitler. Think of all the jobs that were created in the weapons industry and Homeland security thanks to Ben Laden.

Go big Red Go

2006-08-13 05:12:45 · answer #3 · answered by 43 5 · 0 1

Most likely not. Doesn't matter anyway, he is only one part of the problem. I'd be more worried about what Iran is doing, than if Bin Laden is alive or dead.

2006-08-13 05:08:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

NO, you're incorrect and ill-recommended. bypass take a seat in a nook and let the sensible human beings communicate the region. he's likely lifeless, his body replaced into buried lower than the sea for 2 causes: a million) if it replaced into buried on land, it can change right into a shrine (meaning, for those of you who do not realize, bin encumbered's followers can make it a shrine), 2) it truly is element of muslim custom for the body to be buried interior 24 hours. The body does no longer bypass to the kinfolk. Secondly, the helicopter replaced into destroyed because it crashed and the warriors exploded it because they did not choose the incorrect human beings to get the technologies (they snuck in skipped over by ability of Pakistan air-area because of particular technologies). Thirdly, human beings DID die, in a delightful fireplace twist of destiny. there replaced right into a digital camera guy who replaced into kneeling down on the floor decrease than, and from the attitude that the troops were in, it look like the guy replaced into protecting a gun. so that they fired on him. Oh, human beings and their conspiracies... :

2016-11-24 23:02:50 · answer #5 · answered by prickett 4 · 0 0

I doubt it. They'd probably change their group name to Bin Laden.

2006-08-13 05:09:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think he died a couple of years ago and even his people couldn't find his body. His people will never tell the world that their leader is dead.

2006-08-13 08:31:06 · answer #7 · answered by Quetucrees 1 · 0 0

No way.. they love to play up that fear to americans, and he is one of the biggest threats to americans today. BUti think the minute the US government got a hold on the information, they would have it on every news source.

2006-08-13 05:09:54 · answer #8 · answered by rachel k 4 · 0 0

Why would they bother? It's not like he did 911. Everyone with one eye open and a half a brain knows BushCo was behind 911.

Well, maybe they would tell us so Bush would have to stop murdering their people????? Nah, that wouldn't work. You know why? Because BUSH IS A MURDERER.

2006-08-13 05:12:14 · answer #9 · answered by evilposterchild 2 · 0 1

No.

Same with Castro. They both could be dead right now for all we know.

Not that we did anything to cause either possible death, but there they are just the same.

2006-08-13 05:06:51 · answer #10 · answered by ratboy 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers