2006-08-13 04:06:48 · 14 answers · asked by Boomer Sooner#1 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Without a doubt. It was pretty clear what effect he had on the Eagles last year. He will end up being the same poison to the Cowboys this year. He's nothing but trouble. I said it the day the Eagles got him two seasons ago that he would be nothing but trouble and he was. Remember, the Eagles didn't win a super bowl with him so what's the difference? Eagles will rebound this year.
2006-08-16 12:09:59 · answer #1 · answered by The Mick "7" 7 · 19⤊ 0⤋
Go Sooners! I agree.
No way. Philly has terrible WR's now and Westbrook better have some oxygen and a massage therapist handy because he's going to catch a TON of balls and run the ball a lot as well.
Philly desperately needed Owen but if a guy doesn't want to play for you, you get rid of him.
The second year that Owens has played for a team is the time things explode. Look for Owens to have a great year this year and next year for him to go off. He's a sociopath (only cares about his own feelings and literally can't feel others feelings) and I see Parcells quitting next year because of the circus.
2006-08-13 07:05:04 · answer #2 · answered by Ice4444 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Terrell Owens is a virus. You don't feel the effects of him at first, but slowly he starts to attack the rest of the body and eventually your whole team becomes useless. Philly is definately better without him, although it would have been nice if they picked up another reciever in the draft to compliment Reggie Brown.
2006-08-13 05:16:25 · answer #3 · answered by Southpaw 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, yet as a Niner fan, i comprehend how this guy can influence a team negatively, and it will take place for a pair years. The Cowboys season relies upon on Romo, and if Roy Williams can turn in a 1100+ backyard, 7 TD season. you nevertheless have Witten, and he will in all probability be the foremost purpose too. in any case, a minimum of somebody else has the drama and problems that are linked with T.O. - And he's on the decline too. i do no longer wanna see how he's going to act whilst people initiate telling him he's washed up.
2016-11-04 12:00:02 · answer #4 · answered by shea 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Their better off without him. The opposing teams defense's will now have to cover all the field and not just key on Owens. McNabb will be spreading the ball all over the place. Hopefully, that will open up the running game.
2006-08-13 15:11:55 · answer #5 · answered by Alberto 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really, Terrel Owens is an excellent player. Whatever team he plays for will reap huge benefits.
2006-08-16 16:00:35 · answer #6 · answered by Ms-No-It-All 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and No. Yes, because they will be able to distribute the ball to other WR's and TE's without causing trouble. They will also be able to work on running the ball more, so they can complete their offense. No, because they lack an elite receiver. I watched their pre-season game and they are still running the same plays they use to, but the passing is spread out more, so they look like a better team so far without him.
2006-08-13 04:16:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Would you be better off without a festering shanker? Owens is a bum, and I think he's painted a target on his own back.
2006-08-13 12:05:05 · answer #8 · answered by daspook19 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the long run...every team is better off without T.O. Sure he's great and makes great plays. Sure he's fun to watch, but he kills any team spirit eventually.
2006-08-13 06:45:54 · answer #9 · answered by bulldog_guy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you kinda have to be the judge...
personally i think he has his times... and for the most part hes a talented athlete... but on a team u dont need all the Rage and ego... 1 player could make the team go down...
personaly i think hes worked out his problems and they should give him a chance
2006-08-13 04:13:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋