I doubt it. For one thing they are nothing without weapons. Everyone knows that.
Second, there are no bargaining chips. What are they going to ask for in return, that Israel get on a jet to a new country? More to the point, they don't KNOW what they want. If they ever WON anything they'd not know what to do with it. Groups like Hezbollah are in it for the fight and for the power that comes from fighting. They have no goals other than to keep fighting. And of course they'd have a hard time fighting with no weapons!
Finally, who has the power to compel them to disarm? Lebanon? Hardly. Syria THINKS they have the power to do so but when it comes to this, they don't and frankly I doubt if they would tell Hezbollah to disarm even if they did. Iran MIGHT have the ability for force compliance but they're even less likely to do so than Syria.
So, look for this battle to keep getting fought between Hezbollah and whoever (probably Israel, perhaps the rest of Lebanon) in another few months or few years. A group with no goals can never win -- so they keep fighting. Like sharks having to keep swimming to stay alive, Hezbollah stays alive by constant war or threat of war.
2006-08-14 09:21:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by DR 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Some people are apparently too young, to have the facts of the middle east in place. Israel has never attacked anyone to take their lands!! They have taken them when they have been attacked, only to put more space between the borders of the attackers. You have to remember, Israel is only 9 mile wide. The fact that Hezbollah refuses to disarm, even under a UN mandate, would suggest they have no intention to do so. Israel has no reason to attack Lebanon, if Hezbollah was not within rocket range. They did not attack Lebanon this time. They did attack Hezbollah, just for protection of their homeland. After Hezbollah raided their country, killed 9 soldiers and kidnapped 2 others.
2006-08-19 22:52:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by mrcricket1932 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
by way of fact they characterize the aspirations and carry out the applications of the state with interior the southern Lebanon and Beckkar valley section. To the individuals who fall under their administration they are their protector against what they see and an aggressive capability that the Hezbollah effectively defeated and compelled to retreat from their place of beginning. ought to the UN protection council have authorized rigidity to disarm the Hezbollah then it would be as in all likelihood that such an action might are becoming a huge as catastrophe the america of a's attack on Iraq. To the individuals interior the Hezbollah factors and various hundreds of hundreds of people Bin weighted down is a is an incredible hero and the George Washington of the middle east and Bush is a conflict criminal. america of a does not adjust to all UN resolutions, hence neither do different international locations. additionally america of a is over dedicated and isn't any longer able to subdue Iraq, there isn't any reason to think of america of a could be waiting to realize disarmament of the Hezbollah. The Hezbollah has already attacked and defeated American marines in Lebanon and compelled the yankee Marines to withdraw as quickly as already.
2016-12-11 07:56:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not completely, not even if the UN wants them to. There are too many of them in too many houses to completely disarm them. The UN would have to completely take control of the countries and since the US says they will not move troops in there is no other country with enough firepower to get the job done. That is not to say a multinational force could not but when have we seen the UN work in an organized fashion? Not in my lifetime.
2006-08-13 04:08:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mav 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, i dont think they will ever disarm. Hezbollah is more then a militant group, they are the everday people protecting their country from Israel.
2006-08-13 04:15:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by marc.1978 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
No, and I don't think Isreal will stop either.The people in power in any country that is an aggressor anywhere in the world, should have to hold a dead, mutilated loved one in their arms. What will it take to stop all of this cruel killing and devastation? That experience probably wouldn't work either.
2006-08-19 12:42:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope
2006-08-19 19:58:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they'll never do that. they do not care about UN (Ununited Nonsense) and willkeep and stockpile more arms to use against Israel and other nations that donot support their ideology.
they might soon transform into a major terrorist organisation like al qaeda, bombing and killing in nations abroad.
America and Israel should beware.
2006-08-20 00:43:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by durhotimitoyea 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am not really sure, but if they do disarm Lebanon will be completely vulnerable to any new Israeli excuse to strike again or occupy a piece of land!
2006-08-13 04:08:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by rinah 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
It'll be a miracle if they did. I don't think they will because to them, life and death are the one in the same. They won't give up, even if they were offered billions of dollars.
2006-08-13 04:07:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by nobodyd 7
·
0⤊
0⤋