If you could be twice as good looking as you already are, or twice as rich, which would you choose?
2006-08-13 03:55:22 · 29 answers · asked by Oracle Of Delphi 4 in Beauty & Style ➔ Other - Beauty & Style
wealth, then i could get lipo done on my ***!!
2006-08-13 06:08:56 · answer #1 · answered by ♥new baby born xmas eve 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Twice nothing is still nothing. What if I am not very good lookin and I don't make but 25K a year? So twice of either would still not get me anywhere.
Now if you are 3/4 good looking and poor you would want to be twice good lookin because that would make you the best lookin person in the world and you could get a job and in the movies and you would get rich.
Now if you was almost rich and ugly then the money would be the better deal because you would have enough money to be rich now and money takes the place of being good looking and you would just get richer and have all the good lookin women money could buy.
In my case ther would be no advanage one way or the other. I would take the money so I could up my livin standards a little. I get laied enough as it is.
2006-08-13 04:06:36 · answer #2 · answered by Don K 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, for 1- I wouldn't have to be twice as good looking!
For 2- If I was twice as rich I wouldn't be much richer!
But if your saying would you rather have good looks or be rich, I would say good looks!
You could always use your good looks to become rich, but if your rich it doesn't make you any better at being visually any more good looking now does it?!
2006-08-13 04:04:18 · answer #3 · answered by xXx Janette xXx 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Twice as rich, because I guess you could buy looks through surgery. Although I won't because I actually like myself. So it would help to be more richer.
2006-08-13 04:14:16 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i would choose twice as rich cause then with money u can make yourself twice as good looking.
2006-08-14 00:09:56 · answer #5 · answered by vavoom 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Realistically... wealth, no doubt 'bout it.
Dude, good looks fade with time, it's a known fact. Though I'm not talkin' 'bout massive wealth or anythin'... just sufficient enough to support my lifestyle; living comfortably without being dependent on others/ job for your income.
2006-08-13 07:29:59 · answer #6 · answered by ViRg() 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
of course the richer the better. if you are poor and look good what is the point? you will not have friends and cannot throw money to enjoy life. if you are very rich you can have many friends and can throw money to buy anything your heart desire and if you dont like your look you can throw money to a plastic surgeon to make you look good. and can also restyle your hair and looks and buy new clothes and car and house etc.
2006-08-13 04:09:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Neither,I would rather be twice as happy and I don't think looks or money would make a difference in that.
2006-08-13 04:06:13 · answer #8 · answered by rhieanon6108 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
twice as rich...looks only last but for so long. If you have $, you can invest and make even more.
2006-08-13 06:10:21 · answer #9 · answered by mdel 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Twice as good looking as i already am because i have no money so zero times two is zero.or say i have $100 when i multiply it by two it's $200
2006-08-13 04:08:57 · answer #10 · answered by T-bag 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not bothered about my looks (just as well!!). More concerned about wealth but I would rather have a nice personality above either of these!!!
2006-08-13 04:04:42 · answer #11 · answered by robin_peel 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋