English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is not clear to me:
a/ is it war against "terrorists" or
b/ is it war to create more "terrorists".
If it is (b) than Bush would be the best American President ever.
Some researches shows that: 90% OF ALL "TERRORISTS" THAT EXIST TODAY, WERE CREATED LAST 5 YEARS.

2006-08-13 02:43:09 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

Some researches shows that: 90% OF ALL "TERRORISTS" THAT EXIST TODAY, WERE CREATED LAST 5 YEARS

WOW! And by the scope and historical prespective of that question I would have guessed that you were at least seven years old!
If ignorance and blind hatred are bliss you most be one happy...Individual?

2006-08-13 02:54:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The war on terror is actually the war to get hold of world resources or to get the people of their favor in power in the countries having oil etc; . No doubt that this war is creating more terrorist then ever before and spreading hatred among followers of various religion because it is mainly focused against the Muslim countries. The US govt is on the way of implementing NEW WORLD ORDER.

2006-08-13 10:03:38 · answer #2 · answered by hm_pearl 3 · 0 1

The books reviewed herein document a continuous history over the last 40 years of the United States and other governments fostering and manipulating terrorism for their own ends. Terrorist organisations have been used to destabilise inconvenient regimes around the world, and to sow chaos, which can then serve as a pretext for military intervention.

Even more importantly, terrorism is used to create a crisis atmosphere at home under cover of which the crimes and corruption of government officials go unpunished, civil liberties are easily abandoned, and major wars can be launched under false pretences. Although at present there appears to be no reason for the terror-masters in Washington to consider changing their tactics, the publication this year of these two illuminating books raises the hope that the Strategy of Tension, which can only thrive in darkness and confusion, will ultimately have to be abandoned.

# # # # #

Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, The War on Truth, 9/11, Disinformation, and the Anatomy of Terrorism, Olive Branch Press, An imprint of Interlink Publishing, 2005, Northampton, MA
Daniele Ganser, NATO's Secret Armies, Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe, Frank Cass, 2005, London and New York .But what about the September 11 attacks themselves? Were they "blowback," i.e., unintended domestic consequences of foreign covert operations, or were they an integral part of the Strategy of Tension? Based in part on an analysis of intelligence warnings of the attacks, and on the absence of any air defence response, Ahmed strongly endorses the latter view. He reviews the dozens of very specific foreign and domestic intelligence warnings of terrorist attacks in the United States using airliners that came in the months leading up to the attacks. These in turn led to warnings issued by American intelligence to Pentagon officials, and to others, including author Salman Rushdie and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, to cancel all flight plans on the day of September 11, 2001. Meanwhile, no action whatsoever was taken to warn or to protect the American public.

Ahmed points out that the responsible authorities at the Pentagon and the Federal Aviation Administration have produced several profoundly contradictory accounts of their own actions on that day -- each subsequent story seemingly an attempt to remedy the shortcomings of a previous one. And still no remotely satisfactory account of the failure to intercept even one of the four hijacked airliners has been produced. Under ordinary circumstances, interception of wayward aircraft by military fighters would have been absolutely routine; such interceptions occurred at least 56 times in the calendar year prior to September 11, 2001. Ahmed points out that the attacks were allowed to proceed "entirely unhindered for over one and one half hours in the most restricted airspace in the world." He finds the idea that this was due to negligence beyond belief. Instead he argues that there must have been a deliberate stand-down of the air defence system managed by senior national security officials including the vice president and the secretary of defense.

2006-08-13 09:53:13 · answer #3 · answered by jdfnv 5 · 1 2

There is an old saying..

You can't fix stupid

So maybe that explains your question..........Bush's antiterrorism policy has kept your butt from being attacked here in the states for the past 5 years.

Sure Bush's people have their fair share of problems but the fact is that they have took the war over THERE, so we don't have to fight it HERE at home.
The Liberals just want to cut and run and bring the war home to us........

2006-08-13 09:51:04 · answer #4 · answered by kenny p 7 · 3 0

Joke of the world's history. Remember, alleged 'Terrorist Plot" is as fabricated as 9/11. How a world's worst terrorist himself war with terror.

2006-08-13 09:47:42 · answer #5 · answered by bharathghf 2 · 0 2

We have a hidden nuclear war going on right now ... the USA uses Depleted Uranium ammunition that will cause problems to innocent people for the next 4 BILLION YEARS. It is peppering the war zone with a whole bunch of little nukes that do worse damage than one big nuclear explosion, yet the USA people seem OK with it ? why?

And the one lone weapon at the disposal of those whose children will be hurt? terrorism.

2006-08-13 09:48:26 · answer #6 · answered by PlayTOE- 3 · 0 2

You have been reading researchers that are either terrorists or terrorist supporters.

Nothing may ever be clear to you.

2006-08-13 09:49:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

How can we fight ya'll muslim pig terrorist when you come out of your holes bomb innocent people and then run behind and hide amongst women and children. That is how you bunch of yellow cowards do it right?

2006-08-13 09:55:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

apparently his war against terrorists is actually against muslims.to him other types of terrorists are simply allowed..sigh..when is his war gonna end...

2006-08-13 09:51:19 · answer #9 · answered by whoa 3 · 1 1

OBVIOUSLY, IT IS A WAR ON COMMON SENSE AND OF COURSE TO CREATE MORE TERRORISTS BUT THE FACT IS HE (BUSH) HIMSELF IS ACTING LIKE A COMEDIAN TERRORIST!

2006-08-13 09:49:40 · answer #10 · answered by Sami V 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers