I think the majority of people would vote with there best intentions if things were put to a referendum, after all its there interests they are voting for and they are far less open to corruption as a politician or entire goverment!
2006-08-13 04:25:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by surfer soul 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Referedum for what ? If it for sovregnty it may help no ?
They are the Illuminatis, and they own you,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :
And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the Untied Nations Business Council in September 1994
"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)
2006-08-13 07:59:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Patriot 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry to contact you like this but I couldn't Email you directly it seems....
I'm sorry, I don't follow what you mean. What statement are you referring to? My answer you picked? Of course the world would be worse off without countries like the U.S. and Britain. Who would have stopped the Germans, or the French and Bonaparte? Who would have spread the christian word and brought prosperity to poor countries and people and given them hope. That is why I said I quake for what the world would be like without Americas bravery, meaning it is scary for me to think about. I'm not sure how any Americans would be offended by that statement. And I think you got the point of my "stole" statement. Most people who tell Americans we should give the land back to the indians are hypocritical because chances are the land they stand on did not belong to their country to begin with. I hope I have cleared things up for you. If I haven't, please elaborate on the statement I made that would have offended anyone as I rarely include humor in my answers. Thank you for your response to this letter. Take care and I hope to hear from you. Good day.
True Patriot
(This is in response to Email you wrote me.)
2006-08-13 09:33:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lets face it Hunting would be banned for ever and we would be out of Europe.
2006-08-13 04:37:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by deadly 4
·
0⤊
0⤋