English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think he the blame for a vast majority of the wrongs in this country and the world. What do you think?

2006-08-13 01:02:47 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

starreply as an outsider you have acessed the situation here in the states perfectly. We in the states call our money bucks and in the presidents case the buck stops at his desk.

2006-08-13 04:39:05 · update #1

15 answers

An outsiders view - since I don't know too many details, just the overall picture, Bush did win the election by cheating, if a person can do that in the most powerful country in the world, it speaks poorly about the democratic process there. Then he was the incumbent president when 9/11 happened, and he put his foot in his mouth every time he opened it, then he dragged your nation into a war based on lies, he lied to your nation.

The ball for all that happens has to stop somewhere, and it does with Bush, so even if he may not be aware of some of things that have happened, he is the president and ultimately responsible for acts of his fellow countrymen as far as the world is concerned.

I personally think that he is an unfortunate opportunist who grabbed the presidency at the wrong time.

My best wishes to you, your country and countrymen. (not being sexist here)
st

2006-08-13 02:49:38 · answer #1 · answered by Starreply 6 · 7 9

I could consider you here. somebody desperate that he became a foul president via fact he took a stand and in no way wavered, extremely than turn and flop like maximum politicians do. So now they hate him so undesirable they could blame him for each thing. i'm SO ill and uninterested in idiots saying he's the worst president in American historic previous. Any moron who makes such an idiotic declare for sure has no clue approximately American historic previous in any respect, and should no longer pretend to. somebody who's conscious a fragment of something is conscious which you will no longer cost a president till years after his presidency once you are able to ultimately confirm how lots of an prolonged-term impact he made on united statesa.. we are only now attending to the element the place we are in a position to start making purpose judgments approximately Reagan's administration. it is going to likely be 15 years till now we are in a position to confirm Clinton's relative rank properly. So, end saying Bush is the worst in case you have no longer have been given any theory what the heck you're speaking approximately! undergo in techniques, Lincoln had the backside rankings of any president in historic previous for the period of the 300 and sixty 5 days he became re-elected, and became on the time one among the worst presidents ever. Now he's seen by utilising maximum historians as possibly the suitable president in our historic previous. the subject concerns of the worldwide, like terrorism, and issues interior the middle East did no longer initiate whilst Bush got here to workplace. they have been issues for years, even centuries. Bush makes a decision to end worldwide terrorism and now he's the devil himself? How lots experience does that make? Who will the liberals blame ten years from now?

2016-11-04 11:52:29 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I Agree 100%
Hes Good At Everything He Does
Yeah Sure He Makes Mistakes Doesn't Everyone?
I Mean Honestly He Would Be Better Then John Kerry/Hillary Clinton!!

2006-08-13 01:06:10 · answer #3 · answered by Prep♥™ 5 · 9 1

As much as we love to blame Bush, a large part of the current sate of affairs in this country lies with Congress and the Senate. There are no "checks and balances" anymore, just a big game of "follow the leader".

Yes, Bush let it happen. But Congress and the Senate share just as much blame for sitting on their hands and allowing him to run roughshod over the Constitution and, in some cases, giving him the tools necessary to do it.

2006-08-14 03:22:07 · answer #4 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 3 2

Do not forrget the rest of the republican party, they all support him on the economic side of things.
But the true blame is on lawyers and lobbyists.
They pay for the votes and the lawyers (politicians) get paid either way they go and make laws to cover it all up.

2006-08-13 01:06:40 · answer #5 · answered by Biker 6 · 6 1

of course he is, not that he did any of it or was responsible for it all. but him being at such a high position of power every thing that goes wrong is blamed on him....if john kerry was elected ppl would be saying the same things about him...who ever is president always gets blamed for every thing that goes wrong


its the way things work


human nature is well this went wrong in the economy and bush didnt do any thing about it....well could he? did we soon forget the ballance of power

president, congress , courts

its not always his fault and some one some where will always be a nay sayer

you cant please every body

and in no way am i biased about this ...trust me i wanted kerry 2 win

reguardless

i hope that helped

warren

2006-08-13 01:08:42 · answer #6 · answered by milezmonky 2 · 7 2

If not everything, certainly a great majority of the bad things we are experiencing these days. The man is a worm of the worst kind.

2006-08-13 05:10:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 8 2

I think politics was corrupt long before Bush ever came along. There is no other way to explain how he got into the white house in the first place. He's just the latest in a long line of stooges pleasing his masters. When Bush is gone we won't suddenly wake up to a wonderful new day like we imagine. Remember, It's never as good in real life as it is in your fantasies.
Our system is broken. We can all blame Bush and I suspect that is what the real power brokers want us to do. That way they can operate undetected and out of the spotlight.

2006-08-13 14:30:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 6

Mostly, the rest is because his staff has no experience at the jobs they are preforming..That isn't a good excuse either, so back to yes it's his fault as commander and chief of the greatest Country in the World today...I think he would have America second best with the up and coming Communist China....What a leader he is!!!
Oh lookie now my stalker is right on my heels as usual...Hi ya Farkas!

2006-08-13 01:21:06 · answer #9 · answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6 · 11 5

yes he is . he is the number 1 criminal of this world , he turned the whole world into a disaster , he is spending American people's money to kill other country's innocent ppl who has nothing to do with terrorism . he made lame-excuse and attacked Iraq . Iraq , Afghanistan is a disaster .

2006-08-13 01:16:18 · answer #10 · answered by tricksy52002 2 · 8 4

fedest.com, questions and answers