This can not be accomplished. It never happened. Darwin's theory of evolution has not been proven, and now thanks to modern science it is being disproven. Only 9% of the world population now believes in Darwinian evolution.
• According to the theory of evolution, at some time in the distant past there was no life in the universe -- just elements and chemical compounds. Somehow, these chemicals combined and came to life.
• However, scientists don't really know how life came to be. Even Stanley Miller, whose experiments are cited in most biology text books, says that the origin of life is still unknown. The idea that dead material can come to life all by itself is not consistent with scientific observation.
• The leading mathematicians in the century met with some evolutionary biologists and confronted them with the fact that, according to mathematical statistics, the probabilities for a cell or a protein molecule coming into existence were nil. They even constructed a model on a large computer and tried to figure out the possibilities of such a cell ever happening. The result was zero possibility! - Wistar Institute
• Professor Edwin Conklin observed, "The probability of life originating from accident is comparable to the probability of the Unabridged Dictionary resulting from an explosion in a printing shop."
• Under normal circumstances, creatures give birth to the same kind of creatures. It is established scientific fact that like begets like. On rare instances, the DNA in an embryo is damaged, resulting in a mutant child that differs in some respect from its parent. Although a few mutations have been scientifically observed that are beneficial, most mutations produce inferior offspring. For the theory of evolution to be true, there must be a fantastic number of creative mutations that produce new kinds of offspring which are better suited for survival, and therefore are favored by natural selection.
• Darwinists claim that the reptile-to-mammal evolution is well documented. But for reptiles to evolve into mammals at least some of these transformations must have happened:
• Scales had to have mutated into hair.
• Breasts had to have evolved from nothing.
• Externally laid eggs had to evolve into soft-shelled eggs that were nourished by an umbilical cord and placenta in a womb.
• It has never been observed in any laboratory that mutations can cause one species to turn into another. Despite this, evolutionists believe that given enough time, some animals will eventually evolve into other creatures.
• Evolutionists claim that although we have not actually observed these things happening, that does not mean that they are impossible. They say it simply means they are extremely improbable. Evolutionists think the world has been around long enough for all these highly improbable things to happen.
• Sir Fred Hoyle, of Cambridge University stated that statistically the chances of one cell evolving was the same as a tornado passing through a junkyard and giving you a fully functional Boeing 747.
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/arguments.shtml
* Biological Evidence
Evolution - Fact or Faith?
"The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory. Is it then a science or a faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation. Both are concepts which believers know to be true but neither up to the present has been capable of proof."
L. Harrison Matthews FRS - Introduction to Darwin's Origin of Species - 1971 p.11
"It is incredible that most leading scientists dogmatically insist that the molecules-to-man evolution theory be taught as a fact to the exclusion of all other postulates. Evolution in this broad sense is unproven and unprovable and thus cannot be considered as fact. It is not subject to test by the ordinary methods of experimental science - observation and falsification. It does not, in a strict sense, even qualify as a scientific theory." Dr. D. Gish (biochemist) Evolution: The Fossils Still Say No! p.12-13 (1995)
Points to Ponder
Under the right conditions, enzymes have the ability to bring about a combining of otherwise reluctant ingredients and enzymes are able to do this at speeds which get the job done almost instantaneously. Without the thousands of different enzymes within every cell, life would just not be possible. Cells are unequalled masters of efficient chemistry, but for a cell to produce just one enzyme it requires the action of at least 50 different other enzymes. So enzymes are needed to produce enzymes. This fact places us on the horns of a dilemma, for "How did the first enzymes … ever come into being in the first place?" Lester J. McCann - Professor Emeritus in Biology, Quoted in Creation - July 1996 - p.10
This is your life!
A single cell in the human body contains 2 metres of DNA packed into a nucleus only 5 thousandths of a millimetre across. DNA has been described as the 'marvellous message molecule' for it is a vast library of coded commands. Its job is to store the genetic blueprint safely and pass it on unchanged from cell to cell and from generation to generation. The information travelling on the DNA from mother and father is the 'instruction manual' which enables the machinery in the fertilized egg to construct the new living organism from the raw materials. It determines whether the final product will be a hippo, a hamster, a hyena or a human.
If you attempted to store the information packed on DNA on to video tapes it has been calculated it would take a million million (a trillion) tapes!!!!
New Scientist - Nov. 26th, 1994 - p.17
There are estimated to be 75 trillion cells in the human body. If we were to unravel all the DNA and place it end to end it would stretch 90 billion miles (150 billion kilometres). That is the same as travelling from the earth to the sun 1000 times!!! If you attempted to cover this distance travelling at 100 mph non-stop it would take you an estimated 106,000 years!!!
The question therefore arises, 'Where did this code and information come from?', for information never arises spontaneously but originates from a mind. God is the Great Programmer and the amazing DNA molecule is just one of His masterpieces.
http://www.case-creation.org.uk/biolo1.html
Scientific evidence casts serious doubts on the theory of evolution, for example:
* The Problem of Information
for the Theory of Evolution
http://www.trueorigin.org/dawkinfo.asp
* Information Theory and the Origin of DNA: Frequently Asked Questions
http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/infotheoryqa.htm
* Biological Evidence
Evolution - Fact or Faith?
http://www.case-creation.org.uk/biolo1.html
*The Case for Intelligent Evolution
http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/intelligent_evolution.pdf
*Perry Marshall vs. 30+ Skeptics:
From August 2005 to July 2006, I have successfully defended the Information Theory argument for Intelligent Design on Infidels, the world’s largest atheist discussion board.
http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/iidb.htm
* If you can read this, I can prove God exists
http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/ifyoucanreadthis.htm
* Do real scientists believe in Creation?
Partial list of Creation Scientists
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-scientists.html
* New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God
http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/audio/newevidence.htm
* How the theory of evolution breaks down in the light of modern science
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/index.html
* Famous atheist now believes in God
http://www.sciencefindsgod.com/famous-atheist-now-believes-in-god.htm
* Darwinism's Rules of Reasoning
http://www.arn.org/docs/johnson/drr.htm
* Darwinism Is Strongly Rooted But Is Being Challenged
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/summary.shtml
* Evidence for Intelligent Design
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/intelligent-design.shtml
* Scientific arguments against evolution:
Science itself refutes Darwinism
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/arguments.shtml
* Creation Science
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/creationscience.shtml
* The Origins of Darwinism
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/origins.shtml
* Irreducible complexity
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/irreducible.htm
* Anthropic Principle
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/anthropic.htm
* Biological Evidence
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/biology.htm
* Darwinism is Racist
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/racist.shtml
* The Fossil Record (Updated 3 July, 2005)
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/fossil.htm
* Living "Fossils"
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/living.htm
* The Cambrian Explosion
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/explosion.htm
* New T.Rex Discoveries (Updated 10 June, 2005)
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/t-rex.htm
* "Missing Links"
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/misslinks.htm
* The Moon
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/moon.htm
* Earth's Fight Against Solar Attacks
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/earthfight.htm
* References
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/references.shtml
*DNA and the Origin of Life:
Information, Specification, and Explanation
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=1026
* Looking for more information on Intelligent Design?
http://www.arn.org/index.html
2006-08-13 19:26:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by hutson 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
they don't ought to be. yet biblical creationism is at odds with evolution, by using time strains and the genetic issues that could have come from all of humanity being born of two human beings. There are different styles of creationism that don't conflict with evolution however. No it rather is not very probable that God created humanity with the aid of evolution. there is no way any human beings can say what's 'very probable' whilst it includes issues that took place billions of years in the past. you like a clearer expertise of what 'very probable' ability. And specific, the advice that a unmarried cellular has the flexibility to evolve right into a human is astounding. the considerable factor to bear in mind however is that it would not take a God to reason a miracle. It takes a guy or woman to interpret a subject or technique as astounding.
2016-10-02 00:39:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nobody knows yet exactly how life was initially formed out of dead matter. They have found out, accidentally (while doing research for other things), that under particular circumstances as they occur in space on many places, microscopic dust particles covered with a small layer of water-ice on it and other gasses that flow around in space, radiated by UV light, grow into all kinds of complex organic molecules (enzymes) by itself. DNA and other genetic material is made out of these molecules.
How these molecules eventually evolve into something alive science doesn't know yet, that's still to be discovered. But maybe you'll still be around when they do. I hope i will. I'd like to know too.
And it's also a sign that we are problably not the only ones drifting around in space.
2006-08-13 01:20:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Caveman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
All multi-cell organisms start from a single cell that keeps on mutating and dividing based on the instruction encoded in the DNA stored in the nucleus. Each time the cell(s) divide(s), this genetic instruction is duplicated and stored in the other cells. Biology is a wonderous thing!
2006-08-13 00:18:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nikki W 3
·
0⤊
0⤋