how would you live your life, any different, the same? Would you be lazy or become more adventurous.
2006-08-12 23:00:38 · 17 answers · asked by Keanu 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
i have a long years to live.. i would still be the same.. living my life as happy and as contented as i could..
2006-08-12 23:04:20 · answer #1 · answered by Jeunesse 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think life would still be way too short! :)
You know how on vacation in a new place, the second week goes by much faster than the first? Or how time in general seems to speed up the older you get (because you get used to this place here:)? Well, just imagine how fast time would be in the last century of your life!!! :)
I reckon a life span of 1000 years would give us the illusion of having all the time in the world first, and then it would be just like it is now - after you turn about 30 the rest of your years would go by in no time at all.
2006-08-13 06:27:07 · answer #2 · answered by s 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would be less adventurous. If I were to die today, I'd only lose about 50 years of expected life. If we lived to 1000, I'd lose closer to 950. That's a lot of sunsets, orgasms and blueberry pies. I think I might be less lazy because I would have more hope of living to see the results of my labors.
2006-08-13 06:08:26 · answer #3 · answered by Kuji 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I rather live a 100 meaningful years of life. Then , a 1000 redundant lazy years of life.
2006-08-13 06:04:12 · answer #4 · answered by Bright 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And you would have to work a minimum of 950 years before reaching retirement age.
2006-08-13 06:04:40 · answer #5 · answered by ElOsoBravo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The same but I will be able to do more, my life how long would you be at school for lol
2006-08-15 02:27:52 · answer #6 · answered by halloweenpumpkinuk 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would earn dozens of PhDs, work to advance mankind greater prosperity and less suffering, and knock up as many ladies as I could.
2006-08-13 08:35:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
war would be rampant, food short, gas even more expensive and you wouldn't lose your virginity until you were 180 years old, 150 if you're gonna end up as a s.lut. and the drinking age would increase sharply, no thanks man i'll settle for livin to 65.
2006-08-13 06:14:13 · answer #8 · answered by hey_finny 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would be lazy and energetic.. What the hell, I would have all the time in the world right?
2006-08-13 06:07:09 · answer #9 · answered by Mary W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ohh no i don't want to live so much
well am 21 now and want to die at arround the age of 50-55
2006-08-13 06:04:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋