I'm young and am told by those who are older that I must pay a lot of money in order for them to prolong their deaths for as long as possible. Are the children worth less than those who will die in the next 20-30 years? I hear this will make the U.S.A. bankrupt soon. Is this welfare?... I'm confused...
2006-08-12 22:31:22 · 11 answers · asked by silas h 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
no kids, no future, you decide
2006-08-12 22:34:33 · answer #1 · answered by minion 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I surely have 3 little ones, 2 females 14 and eight and a 7 3 hundred and sixty 5 days old son. I spend maximum of my time working them to activities, college activities, scouts helping with homework, handling teenage disaster and lots greater. My house is usualy became the different way up from them and their associates, i flow with out issues i'd decide for to have so as that they'd have what they decide for and many what they decide for. i arise drained and flow to mattress exhausted. i'm no longer basically mom i'm chauffer, cook dinner, maid, nurse, psychiatrist, cub scout chief, woman scout chief, soccer coach, plumber, referee, instructor and each thing else you are able to think of. If fortunate my husband and that i've got an hour an afternoon for surely time together after the toddlers are tucked in for the nighttime yet regardless of all of that there is not any longer something and that i do mean no longer something that I appreciate greater in existence. My little ones are my clarification for residing and make existence properly worth at a similar time as. Seeing their faces whilst they are excited approximately some thing or getting a hug and an i such as you for no reason is properly worth each and every sacrafice that we've made. the affection of a youngster is the sole unconditional love a man or woman will ever relatively comprehend and that i comprehend sometime they're going to strengthen up depart domicile and initiate a relatives of their very own and then my husband and that i could have our time and howdy then i will get that new lounge suite that doesn't could be toddler info!
2016-11-04 11:48:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was a little confused by your question. But I think I know what you're talking about. The Baby Boomers are adults born between 1950 and 1960. I'm not exactly sure about those dates, but it was about that time. In the next ten years or so, those adults will be hitting retirement age. They called them the Baby Boomers b/c there was a massive amount of childbirth during this time period. There is literally more people that will hit retirement age than ever before in the US. The thing is that our taxes are going to significantly increase so we can support these people, b/c otherwise our country can't afford to pay all of their social security and other benefits.
As for children....you only ask this b/c you haven't had any. If you ever do, you'll look into their little eyes...that look somewhat like your own...and know without a doubt that they are very 'worth it.'
2006-08-12 22:41:36 · answer #3 · answered by Cy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The simple fact of the confusing statements are that there are going to be more old people who will be able to draw social security than those that can't in the next 40 yrs. The fact that they can draw social security doesn't mean they will, or the real possibility that the government will probably dramatically change social security in the next years. There will probably be a law passed that raises the minium age for social security, after the baby boomer die off, and lowers how much you can make and still qualify for it. So please have all the children you can in the next 20 yrs, they will be the bread winners in 20 yrs after that. Actually social security needs to change, it wasn't designed to support so many people for 40 yrs or more, most people were supposed to be dead before they could reach the minium age.
2006-08-12 22:46:50 · answer #4 · answered by jadeaaustin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is true, but you have your life to live and taxes are a fact of life. If you didn't pay them you would not be able to have unemployment insurance and get a little helpful cash if you get fired, if your apt. burns down your firefighters may help your life, if someone is trying to break into your house and there's no law it would be a lot worst for you.
Here's the thing, Kids are great there's nothing like having your own but can't appreciate until you do. It is a scary thing but it will happen if you ever find the right girl that loves you for who you are and vice-versa.
Don't believe all the crap you hear about Social Security, this is one of many points politician use to scare us and get us to vote for them. It is bull....
2006-08-13 04:56:34 · answer #5 · answered by searing 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you mean your tax paid goes mostly to older people eh?! i dont think it's cos they worth more than children but most of the time little kids have a strong financial support from their parents and a lot of older people are living alone since their spouses pass away. Also, older people are more prone to getting sick/injuries, so they need more medical attention and that's a big part of where the money's going --> medical insurance ;)
2006-08-12 22:57:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Im not quite sure what you are trying to ask. Are you trying to say that when you pay tax, it goes to help older people rather than help new borns? Because in whatever country you come from, they both get a cut out of tax payers money, children usually get a bigger cut.
2006-08-12 22:40:35 · answer #7 · answered by Chris 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Children ARE the Future
2006-08-12 22:38:47 · answer #8 · answered by funguy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think the peaple who told u that werw wrong u he to work and to pay to the good
2006-08-12 22:40:41 · answer #9 · answered by hend a 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
children are a gift from God - there is nothing more beautifull
2006-08-12 23:22:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋