As I assume many know, a person is often defined as great by how that person acted in a single moment during a single, even short, event. The same holds true of presidents. Single moments in their presidencies can define them as the greatest president ever. But is that fair? Do some US presidents deserve more accolades than other presidents made famous by their history altering deeds? Are presidents that never really change the world less to us although they might have display more competence, and had more successes? Are there any presidents that have shown both? Should Washington, Lincoln, Kennedy, and a few others, forever be put above the other presidents?
2006-08-12
21:53:10
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Important correction: The words Change and Display should be in their past tense forms. I apologies for any confusion.
2006-08-17
09:39:59 ·
update #1