or would you do the whole "thou shalt not kill" thing? also, just to put your answer in context, what are your general stances on capital punishment and the llike?
2006-08-12 20:30:12 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I probably would, because it would sort of be in self defense, wouldn't it?
Capital punishment? All for it and no tolerance for disagreement.
2006-08-12 20:36:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As much as I would like to kill him - I think it would be more productive if he were tortured and interrogated by the CIA. That way we could hopefully learn the location of enough terrorist cells to take down the entire organization.
Afterwards? I think we should have a public execution on what is left of the World Trade Center. He should be made to suffer. Then he should be buried with pigs blood and swine intestines.
Turn the other cheek? Thou shalt not kill?
THAT went out with 9/11.
I SAY BURN THE BASTARDS AND MAKE THEM PAY!
2006-08-13 04:00:53 · answer #2 · answered by Techguy2396 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No i woun't
Ossama Bin laden used to Co operate with Us Government Long time ago they Used Him Against Russain
then he was the perfect Reason to Contol oil in Kozwayn see in afganistan
Why Kill Such Treasure ?
2006-08-13 03:39:30 · answer #3 · answered by thunder 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a yellow dog Dem---HOW ever I am 100% for capital punishment! ALWAYS have been, Some folks just need killing... as for a s Osama!!! NO I would just give him to his people and let them deal with him!!! I hear they have some neat ways of Killing folks over there....
2006-08-13 03:40:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I would not kill him. I would require him to go to my meditation class to receive deeksha* for about a year. It rilly works! It rilly helped me get through my depression/trauma after my last relationship (in which my g/f abused me physically and emotionally).
I guarantee that after just six or seven months of deeksha, Osama bin Laden would be thinking of helping people rather than killing them for their differences.
*deeksha--a Sanskrit word meaning "Divine grace," which is administered by those who have been given the gift of giving it via touching the crown of a person's head during meditation. It does not involve changing a person's religion--the person simply receives deeksha and during meditation is instructed to connect with his/her Higher Self--whether it's God, Mother Earth, Allah, Vishnu, or Buddha (or in whatever form you envision your Higher Self)--which facilitates the flow of energy in the body.
2006-08-13 03:43:52 · answer #5 · answered by ♣Tascalcoán♣ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
capital is the answer, how much is the blood money on that sucker up to anyhow.
It is a bit better than some thirty pieces of change like what you would expect for a nobody.
2006-08-13 03:33:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He deserves to be punished for desecrating a beautiful religion such as Islam and foir killing many innocents under a delusion
2006-08-13 05:39:24 · answer #7 · answered by Darkness 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Osama bin Laden is NOT the most dangerous terrorist in the world today.
2006-08-13 03:58:36 · answer #8 · answered by EMAILSKIP 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because I would like to see what he has to say in a trial. I am sure that hired by Cheney and Rumsfeld to commit 911.
Btw, Bush supporters only believe in thou shall not kill or having a fair trial if you are American... everybody else they believe should just be killed on sight.
2006-08-13 03:34:13 · answer #9 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No I woudnt kill him I would torture him keeping him alive by throwing him a rat to eat once in a whle.Probably some water too,I wouldnt want to seem inhumane
2006-08-16 15:12:20 · answer #10 · answered by charles 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋