2006-08-12 19:35:55 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
If the fighter is sheltered in a civilians house then that makes the civilian a guerrilla as well.
2006-08-12 19:42:40 · update #1
What is the cost of three thousand dead soldiers and at least twenty thousand injured soldiers ?
2006-08-12 19:45:29 · update #2
Mass production would lower the cost !!!
2006-08-12 19:47:12 · update #3
I think it was Colin Powell who said "Why use a million dollar missile to blow up a ten dollar shack?" Or something to similar to that.
2006-08-12 20:06:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It certainly is reason behind problem for India, yet then US continually acts on lobbyists pastimes, and the U. S. hands foyer needs to target particular guns in particularly warfare circumstances and what extra effective sorting out floor than a much flung usa like India. India has to proceed to be prepared to face each and every project and should be militarily properly equipped. yet one component is convinced that our adult men in the back of the guns are likely the great armed rigidity contained in the international, because our militia have proved it with the aid of wresting away the kargil peaks from the properly entrenched enemy. the completed international consisting of US become a great deal surprised as to the way it become achieved. So ought to correctly be US is insecure once back because contained in the warfare of 1971 between India and Pakistan, the mightly Patton tanks were blown to smithreens with the aid of precise Indian Air rigidity or perhaps in Air India had proved its superiority with the aid of its small Gnat jets over the added state-of-the-paintings jets of Pakistan, that were of route US made. US continually has this awe for Indian military and Air rigidity, many years in the past in the course of a delightful joint Air rigidity drill, the U. S. pilots were outsmarted. The intense Air rigidity good remarked that it is nice for US for under no circumstances having to pass to warfare adversarial to India, because India ought to maximum possibly arise the winner with such in a position and dedicated pilots.
2016-11-30 00:35:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we do use them. Just need a target. I don't see why we don't reactivate some of the land based ICBM's refit them with modern guidance systems and let them rain down on the enemies. Wouldn't have to use nuke warheads, but why not.
2006-08-13 03:30:03 · answer #3 · answered by Roadkill 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just wanted to add that a BGM-109 Tomahawk missile is about 2 million dollars. - This might have something to do with how often it is used.
2006-08-12 19:38:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They don't want people to see the damage a cruise missile can do. It'll remind them of the Pentagon.
2006-08-12 21:31:09 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOW that is a great idea. 25 cruise with a 5headed MRV would just about do the whole terrorist world!!
2006-08-12 19:40:44 · answer #6 · answered by mr.phattphatt 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are when needed. Everyday. Just doesn't make news that you blew something up 500 miles away.
2006-08-12 19:37:57 · answer #7 · answered by mikis1967 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't matter how accurate a weapon is when your enemy is hiding in a civilian's house.
2006-08-12 19:37:30 · answer #8 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ur enemies?? u mean the people at the white house??
2006-08-12 19:38:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are about ONE MILLION DOLLARS EACH.
and our enemies don't stay in one place very long.
2006-08-12 19:43:11 · answer #10 · answered by michael p 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋