2006-08-12 19:14:36 · 8 answers · asked by Dr MK Khaishagi 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I am glad the war is ending... and yet look at Israel amassing 30,000 troupes in Southern Lebanon only to show it has not eaten dust!!
What did they achieve by getting 150 of their soldiers killed and some 1000 Lebanese civilians and children?
It is a lesson to realize that you have to learn to respect and live with neighbours and not bully people around. The colonial times are over. This is a new age. Nobody can accept to be treated inferior, only because of your education, origin and race. It seems Israeli mind set is really outdated and out of tune with times.
2006-08-12 20:57:27 · answer #1 · answered by boogie man 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Whether it is fair or unfair, Israel and Hezbollah has accepted for a ceasefire according to the latest news. If it is going to be true, I doubt what was the reason behind this war. This conflict had killed thousands of people, people become homeless, children lose their parents and a many kids has been brutally killed by the Israel bombing. I still believe the real reason behind this war is ammunition trading. Trading on weapon is blooming especially in Middle East regions. I believe some of the top officials from UN as well as some Western and Arab leaders also have hand in these weapon trading and conflicts. A truthful and sincere investigation is urgently required to root out those "war lords" who killed thousands of innocent people and put a generation into miserable condition.
2006-08-12 19:37:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why ought to the U. S. do in any different case? To enable Israel be destroyed with the aid of the Arabs and their Iranian best pal is an identical factor as letting democracy get replaced with the aid of dictatorships. Israel those days gave up territory for the Palestinians regardless of if it did no good. Why not? by using fact all Arabs, which incorporate many (if not maximum) Arab communities interior the USA, want the full destruction of Israel. the U. S. might desire to stand up for Israel and against the dictators who make up lots of the UN. The UN is a ineffective, blind, wandering anti-US business enterprise and that's placed interior the U. S.. How ridiculous is that?
2016-10-02 00:32:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I think it's a diplomatic decision that will not solve the issue of the 2 kidnapped Israeli soldiers, and will allow Hezbollah to regain it's military capacity in a short time and very soon it will attack the UN peace keeping force, Israel and the next thing you know Israel will be forced to attack Lebanon again, which will only create more hate, loss of life and give more rise to fanatics in the middle east.
2006-08-12 19:24:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have not had a chance yet to examine the final resolution since France and the USA made a compromise. Sorry, I wish I could answer.
2006-08-12 19:28:18 · answer #5 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It would be fair only if they took away all the guns and rockets from Hezbollah. Both sides would have to sign in blood that they would observe the peace at any cost. No more killing!!!!
2006-08-12 19:20:50 · answer #6 · answered by wunderkind 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is fair by all means , they also need the UN personnel being able to get there
2006-08-12 19:18:11 · answer #7 · answered by josramco 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is fair but I don't think it will work.
2006-08-12 19:24:02 · answer #8 · answered by cashcobra_99 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋