Your answer is yes. There are series expansions for both Napierian (base e) and common (base 10) logs and antilogs. It appears that Phoenix (see above) has one.
Kepler used logs for his calculations 400 years ago, and they didn't have computers or calculators then -- but they did have tables, and you can interpolate using 5-place tables.
I'd have to look in a calculus book to find the series expansions, but for what you want to do, I don't think you need them.
You want to calculate X^Y, where both X and Y are fractions. Suppose Z = X^Y, where X = A/B. Then
Z = X^Y = (A/B)^Y = (A^Y)/(B^Y)
log Z = log[(A^Y)/(B^Y)] = log(A^Y) - log(B^Y)
log Z = Y log A - Y log B = Y(log A - log B)
Then, to get Z, all you do is take the antilog.
Of course, maybe this is what you want to do. If you want to do it using the series expansions, they're available. Here's one (I don't know if this is what Phoenix used):
(1/2) log[(1+z)/(1-z)] = z + (z^3)/3 + (z^5)/5 + ...
2006-08-12 20:54:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by bpiguy 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes you can, but it is complicated:
1. Natural Logarithm of a number is given by the log-series:
ln (1 + x) = x - (x^2)/2 + (x^3/3) - (x^4/4) + .........
plug in the value for 'x' as required and evaluate RHS upto infinite terms, lol... j/k (you can evaluate upto 10 terms to be on the safe side)
2. Antilog of a number 'x' is exponential 'e' raised to the power of 'x', where e = 2.17828. To evaluate power of a real number, use the binomial theorem.
2006-08-12 17:55:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
yeah.. i think.. cant u just convert it over to the log of 10 with the constant being X and have the Y move to the front of the logarithm and then if u have a different base then just convert...
i dont know.. Calculus was like last year.. thats a whole summer inbetween..:)
2006-08-12 17:34:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cowgirl Up 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, you can mathematically derive logarithms.
2006-08-12 18:56:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Arkangyle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes but its long and tiresome .The inventor of the logarithmic table did it.
2006-08-19 19:48:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by yar2005 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. By graphing...
2006-08-12 17:31:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by !_! 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes, but why would you want to when you CAN use a calculator.
2006-08-20 03:28:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by chris m 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, but it is a secret...
2006-08-12 17:30:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋