haha .. caught 'butchell' on wrong foot
0.14 ghz faster is correct
fsb of T2400 & T2500 is ditto @ 667 mhz
4 gaming spend those extra bucks, else the t2400 is good enough !
2006-08-12 16:50:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by sεαη 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
speed
if you compare internet access of both the processors the 2.8 Hz opens up your pages faster than 1.86Hz
also T2500 tends to produce less heat than the T2400
Otherwise, for home use T2400 is more than sufficient, unless you are doing some serious graphics work
2006-08-12 23:42:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by charmer 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
The difference is .14GHz. The T2500 will be slightly faster. How noticibly faster? Just a little.
2006-08-12 23:40:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
not really... duo processors are a cool idea but i prefer to use a true 64 bit process (ie. Athlon 64) they are faster. A duo processor has two 32 bit processors but that doesn't make it a 64 bit.
2006-08-12 23:41:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nik R 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
the 2 gig is a bit faster. but if its a huge leap in price and you are not really looking to spend that much then go with th e1.8 gig.
2006-08-12 23:40:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by pevehead 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
It all depends on what you are going to use it for. For the average end consumer, there will be little to no difference.
2006-08-12 23:41:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by MB_Bailey 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
not realy, they will make no diffrence. maybe if its 2.5 or maybe 3
2006-08-12 23:40:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Zarcaris 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
2.0 ghz are better, I believe if I'm not mistaken that the more giga hertz the faster.................I am sure that 2.0 is better though..................Pick the 2.0 one I'm telling you It's better!!
2006-08-12 23:44:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by BR!@NN@ M@R!3 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No difference either.
2006-08-12 23:40:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
.14ghz, and possible bus speed
2006-08-12 23:40:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by butchell 6
·
0⤊
1⤋