I think the "Gay" party is called the "Demo-crat-ic Par-ty". For the following reasons, they are afraid to fight face to face, they believe they are entitled to anything and everything without doing a damn thing to earn it, they believe that just because they are "different" they should be recognized for it (hey, we're all different, I'm not asking for a medal because I'm 6 feet tall and I'm a female), they are obnoxious, they support Hilary Clinton even though she supports Sen. Robert Byrd (for those of you who don't know- Senator Byrd (D-VA) is a card carrying member of the KKK), also, gay people call names and get offended when the obvious is stated, ie. gay people are queer.
On the topic that Gay people should have their own party, I don't feel that's really necessary, because they usually are too busy being fabulous to remember to vote anyway.
Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against people who are gay. It's the people who think they are special, and use it as an excuse to be snotty and rude that I have no tolerance or patience for.
2006-08-12 14:51:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dana-D 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'd like to make it clear to the people who run the Antichrist Party that I will not support Hillary Clinton for president.
What kind of courage does it take, for mercy's sake? The majority of the American people (85 percent) think the war in Iraq is not a mistake and that we should not get out. The majority (95 percent) of the American people do not want single-payer health care and are not willing to pay more taxes to get it. The majority (86 percent) of the American people do not favor raising the minimum wage. The majority of the American people (90 percent) do not favor repealing Bush's tax cuts, The majority (96 percent) wants to reduce the deficit by cutting domestic spending, but not by reducing Pentagon spending
She sold her soul to the devil back in 2000, this is a fact I was there and saw it with my own two eyes the price was not revealed. And she is an active member of the KKK
2006-08-12 14:40:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Heroic Liberal 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perhaps homosexuals should be given respect as human beings like you and I, and perhaps they should stop alerting us every now and then that they are different.
Sexuality is not that important a part of life. It's just a chemical reaction.
And, no, they should not have their own political party. There are two possible scenarios, neither of which is good:
1--they are voted out/banned/heckled/stifled by the church and thus would serve no proper function but to inflame either camps
2--they would be voted in by liberals who simply want to show that they are not anti-gay, we'd get a lousy political system run by folks whom are not necessarily capable and the action would also alienate the church.
2006-08-12 14:35:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Vernita G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gay people need to take action to secure the same rights in a marriage or living arrangement that straight people have. If this action is to support parties or candidates, if there is a candidate that supports their cause (most in the Democratic party) then I think they should vote and work for that candidate's election. If there is no such candidate, then a political party may serve their interests - but running one may cause Republicans to be elected; serves the Democrat right for not supporting their cause.
2006-08-12 14:36:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by alnitaka 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What are all the question marks for? Should bisexuals have their own political party too, or would it be the same as the gay political party? Just a thought. What about African-Americans, should they have their own political party too, or is it called.........?????????
2006-08-12 14:34:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by karibik172003 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm really 50/50 on this whole gay marriage thing... Personally I think it's disgusting. BUT, a person can't really help who they fall in love with. Come on people- Have you ever been in love? And have you ever been told you can't love them? Straights, gays, lesbians- it's still the same freaken over powering love feeling.
Just let them be. some say it's against the law of nature. I agree. But- Who says it's a law to begain with? Love is love.
2006-08-12 14:37:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by roxylee11782 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Then we'd have political parties that represent all kinds of personal aspects and preferences.
Our Favorite Color is Orange Party? Chocolate Cake Party?
2006-08-12 14:35:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by CrispyEd 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe you could have your own political party. I don't want to break down all the subcultures and have women in one party, white men in another, black men in yet another, protestant whites in another... I am sure you see where I am going. If you are prejudiced, you will find a group to kick into another subgroup no matter how many there are. Lighten up and live and let live please.
2006-08-12 14:36:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by swarr2001 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They do, it is the democrats as we are tolerant and not worried about somebody else's life style, I am proud when a gay person tells me that he or she is a democrat. Proud to have them as part of the progressive party.
2006-08-12 14:53:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. That one small aspect of their lives, who they choose to have relationships with, doesn't define everything they think and believe.
And I know many gays who are Republican, because they support the rest of the conservative agenda. It's just sad that so many in their own party hate them because of how they choose to conduct their relationships with others.
2006-08-12 14:31:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
1⤊
0⤋