For HIS faliure to get Bin Laden when he was commiting terrioist acts on US Embassies? He was even offered to slick willy.
2006-08-12 13:54:02 · 18 answers · asked by Simms 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If he WANTED to , he could of and would of.
2006-08-12 14:00:51 · update #1
He will never be arrested. When will Bush be charged with dereliction of duty for ignoring the report 'Bin Laden Determined to Strike in the US'? Perhaps that title was too subtle for him? And if you're so keen to see bin Laden caught, how do you feel about Bush giving up his half-hearted pursuit?
2006-08-12 14:01:24 · answer #1 · answered by Dunrobin 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Clinton did want to do something but a Republican Congress said NO. Bush knew everything that Clinton knew and then some and like the other post said, he had been in office almost a year (so let's stop blaming Clinton). And guess what? Clinton got a lot of his information from (who would have guessed this) Daddy Bush!! Lets go back to the beginning if you want to make it right.
2006-08-12 14:16:52 · answer #2 · answered by MrsMike 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There is nothing worse than a Monday morning quarterback. Quite obviously Clinton and even Republican administrations before him, would have eliminated him many years ago if they knew what he was capable of.
2006-08-12 14:10:04 · answer #3 · answered by remmo16 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are still blaming Clinton, that is beyond belief. Bush had been in office a full 9 months when 9/11 happened and was advised of the danger and he did nothing to stop it. Clinton did the right thing when he was in office and George Bush makes him look like and angel, so get over it and get a life.
2006-08-12 13:58:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
That is just rediculous. The only one who is responsilbe for those deaths are the terrorists themselves. Would you want the mother of a killer to be arrested because her child became a killer and she should have known? You're being an ***.
2006-08-12 14:00:18 · answer #5 · answered by Keebler 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bill clinton wanted to go to war with Bin Laden in 1993 but congrees would not support the idea that is why it is going on now.
2006-08-12 13:59:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
First of all
Even though i detest clinton, It was not his fault at all. It's not one man. If you even beg to ask this question you need to study history. Figure out that there is so much more to this situation then one man, it's a country that defends god/israel, and we will continue to do so. Look, people in this country need to get off their coaches and wake up to reality, our life isin't going to be so normal when thousands who believe they are getting virgins if they kills us off.
get a grip
2006-08-12 14:00:15 · answer #7 · answered by browningny 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because it happened on Bush's watch. Bush is to be blamed. When will you neocons accept responsiibility. Be a man for once.
2006-08-12 22:02:08 · answer #8 · answered by P P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What you ask is after the fact which so often happens unfortunately.How about we go after Ted Kennedy instead for Chappaquidick .
2006-08-12 14:13:09 · answer #9 · answered by locksniffer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As soon as BOOsh is punished for ignoring all briefings brought before him in the months leading up to those attacks. Additionally, this will occur as soon as BOOsh is Impeached for his numerous crimes against this nation as well as his violations of international laws that we are bound by.
2006-08-12 14:00:47 · answer #10 · answered by Daniel C 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋