English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it possible that people here can honestly consider and say why the likes of Germany, Italy, France, Holland, China, Belgium, Sweden, Denmark, Brazil, Argentina and many others are not targets of so called 'Islamo-Fascists'? A word by the way that Karl Rove taught Bush.

2006-08-12 13:15:01 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

32 answers

i hear ya!!! and that's the first thing that came to mind!! they felt like Israel is starting to lose their image and needed something to get the people's act together. and what else would it be other than a terrorist attack!!!!

how convenient!!!!

2006-08-12 13:25:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Not it is not coincidence....

They are just forging the "right major crisis" they need to make us swallow anything like Martial Law, and their New World Order....

They are the Illuminatis, and they own you,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :

And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the Untied Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

2006-08-13 07:03:04 · answer #2 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 0 0

I guess they don't know where Germany, Italy, France, Holland, China, Belgium, Sweden, Denmark, Brazil, Argentina and many other are.

2006-08-12 14:16:37 · answer #3 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 0 0

We are targets because we dare to disagree with the Islamonazi point of view, though ironically if one studies the facts and figures we are also the places where per head more Muslims have emigrated to over the past 40 years. "Terrorists" (as you hint that they are not) hide behind a face of normality and this is precisely what they are doing now - coming into our country, pretending to integrate with us but the whole while despising us for our beliefs. These "terrorists" believe that we are infidels and thus should be killed as an abomination to god - fact they just do. I'm proud to be British and also proud of the special relationship that we have with the USA and if that means that we are unlike the cowardly others then believe me I'm not on my own in feeling a little proud. Its all going to come to a head and the Islamonazis are going to show their true colours.

2006-08-12 21:47:23 · answer #4 · answered by heath 3 · 0 0

So Mr humanist i guess you think Saddam's a nice guy and that we should call the dogs off in the search for bin laden, after all we wouldn't want too infringe on their human rights now would we?

Regardless of the rights and wrongs of getting into this war on terrorism, both the UK and US have a huge amount of men and women serving in countries throughout the world, so that you have the freedom to call yourself a humanist.

As long as the streets in either the UK or US can be attacked by these "yellow bellied cowards" that are known as terrorists, we in our safe little homes should be a little more grateful for our Armed Forces who are incidentally doing a fine job as humanists their selves.

2006-08-12 13:58:35 · answer #5 · answered by billyfwlr 2 · 0 0

You have a point.But when terrorists strike the UK or USA it has an effect world wide,because the whole world has to stop.
Next time you hear the news and you see a News flash.
Check out Wall street and watch those numbers go down fast!
The UK and USA have the largest amount of solidiers in the terrorists countrys thats why they attack allegedly,truth is we never know.HA HA did you know that everytime you write the word terrorist of a word similar your put on a register!
Cool huh!

2006-08-12 13:21:42 · answer #6 · answered by ♥The♥ Bearded Cheerleader 3 · 0 0

US and UK are targets for a lot of people around the world. It's just that the animal arab muslims don't know anything other than violence and wiping their *** with their bare hand.

Gonna blame terrorist acts on the war in Iraq? We weren't in Iraq when Al Qaeda bombed the World Trade Center the first time in 93. Remember the USS Cole bombing?

We didn't start this, but we will end it. And I can't wait until the days of 45 cents for a gallon of gas.

2006-08-12 16:03:15 · answer #7 · answered by johnnyxgriswold 1 · 0 0

Because those countries are committing the most military resources against terrorists, and taking the biggest public stand on the issue. So, naturally they are the biggest target.

But don't forget all the attacks against Spain, France, Italy, Germany, Israel, and Holland over years. Spain and France have been hit almost as bad (if not as bad) as England. And then there's the whole Dutch cartoon thing.

2006-08-12 13:19:56 · answer #8 · answered by coragryph 7 · 5 0

Many countries have been targets of terrorist attacks by Islamic extremists:

2000, Yemen;
2001, America;
2001, France (attempted terrorist attack);
2002, Tunisia;
2002, Bali;
2002, Kenya;
2003, Morocco;
2003, Jakarta;
2003, Turkey;
2004, Spain;
2005, UK.

(The attacks in Muslim countries were either on tourist sites or embassies.)

Do not make the mistake of thinking terrorists have rational motive. That's like saying only women dressed in skimpy outfits get raped. Like all criminals, it's opportunity they seek, not risk.

2006-08-12 13:31:50 · answer #9 · answered by kim21uk 2 · 0 0

Israeli infantrymen are lots of the main honorable interior the worldwide. Israel isn't an occupier of the land given completely to them by utilising God. The squatters on Israel's land to boot via fact the media portray Israel in strategies that are completely fake. The comments are crammed with Anti-Israel bias.

2016-11-04 11:17:34 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Holland saw a prominent director publicly murdered by Islamic radicals. France had literally thousands of cars torched this past year by Muslim hooligans trying to force shiara law on her. Russia, which has utterly refused to assist the US & UK, has suffered several attacks by Muslim terorists including the massacre at Beslan. Spain had a major train bombing attack *after* promising to give in to terrorist demands. Also note that you left out India, Philippines, Singapore, and Greece - all targets of Islamic terror in recent years. Having a convenient lapse of memory, sir?

2006-08-12 13:24:48 · answer #11 · answered by dukefenton 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers