2006-08-12 12:36:58 · 8 answers · asked by rumplesnitz 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The Unborn. The Gays have money & power.
The Unborn will be slaughtered by the millions. They have no lawyers, no union, and no spokesman.
There is Big Money in killing babies. Thousands of people are getting rich and elected to office by slaughtering the Unborn.
It's a money and power thing.
2006-08-12 12:46:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Given the tendency of a certain "moderate" Supreme Court Justice (Anthony Kennedy) to bounce back and forth across the ideological ping-pong table, why not both?
I'd like to see the expression on the faces of some liberals if a cadre of arrogant, deceitful Supreme Court Justices decide that abortion must be banned because of the Equal Protection Clause.
By the way, I am gay. But when it comes to constitutional law, I believe in the original intent of the Framers. And I know that the Framers of the 14th amendment would have called me a "sodomite." The fact that the gay community compares itself to blacks is merely a legal strategy in order to win in the courts, and I'm disgusted with it.
I suppose I would have a "love/hate" friendship with jamesdkral.
2006-08-12 13:45:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
People are not born gay. There is no scientific evidence to support the idea that anyone is born gay. But no matter what science says, i'm sticking with what God's word the Bible says, because God is never wrong, but sometimes science is wrong. I don't believe in being mean to people who struggle with homosexual temptation, but I don't believe in condoning the behavior either. Love the sinner, hate the sin. Unborn human lives have just as much right to live as the rest of us. We need to save the unborn human lives from being killed. Stem-cell research is no excuse to kill innocent human lives.
2006-08-12 12:41:41 · answer #3 · answered by jamesdkral 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no longer in call, yet below the definitive "Equality", specific.. The combat for "gay Rights" is approximately equality and that's the combat.. The LGBT community replaced into omitted of the regulations of Civil Rights, by utilising definition, so as that's why it extremely is termed "gay Rights".... there isn't any religious time table or any attempt of adjusting what's, fairly our rights as people in u . s . could be recognized basically as everybody else are below the regulations of Civil Rights (and Constitutional Rights as nicely)
2016-12-17 09:49:03 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gay unborn babies I guess. But would you ever know.
2006-08-12 12:38:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Let's hope it's unborn babies.
2006-08-12 12:43:48 · answer #6 · answered by trinitytough 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
it is disturbing that you would take such a stance on something as important as civil rights
2006-08-12 12:44:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
gays
2006-08-12 12:38:38 · answer #8 · answered by W E J 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋