I wish people would just leave the poor man alone!!
♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥
2006-08-12 12:24:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Michael Jackson??
No i do not think, he will be a good UN ambassador.
2006-08-12 12:03:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mag 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope! But I think Timothy Dalton would.
ashleyligon1967
Level 4
What is this movie called?
It's about this family who comes to America on a boat in the 1800's. I think they were part of the potato famine immigrants or they were sweidsh/norweigan immigrants. Anyhow they settle in Minnesota/Wisconsin or maybe the Dakotas. It's about a REALLY large family, children are born, people die, typical family angst. I saw it at a friends house in 1992 but I am not sure of the release date. Anyone out there have any IDEA's of what movie this might be even if you are unsure throw movie titles out it might be it. Thanks
(6 minutes ago - 2 answers )
2006-08-12 12:01:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, it would send the world a message that the United States believes the UN to be a joke.
2006-08-12 12:01:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Edward 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
You mean Under Nine ambASSador. Yeah he'd be good at that.
2006-08-13 03:38:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by deedleydee 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not for children, but otherwise he could use his celebrity to do a lot of good for the UN.
2006-08-12 12:05:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes! He's a very good (but weird) guy who has given hundreds of millions to charity.
2006-08-12 19:23:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jennifer 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, he would be better as president of Save the Children
2006-08-12 12:01:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bill 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe if it was more like a model UN conference, with young people. Ahem.
2006-08-12 12:01:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by paddy 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
By UN, you mean United Nutcases, right?
2006-08-12 12:03:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by F. Frederick Skitty 7
·
0⤊
1⤋