i really liked the first and second the best. third was okay.., but the fouth was the worst to me! they took off so much of the other stories in the movie and they completely ignored the house elves! they focused too much on the tri wizard tourney. i didn't like it.
2006-08-12 11:41:16 · 15 answers · asked by xxdvslilangelxx 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
The fourth movie is my favorite, because the fourth book is my favorite. They had to leave more out in this movie because the fourth book is about twice as big as the first, second, and third books, but the movie still had to be the same length.
2006-08-12 12:10:10 · answer #1 · answered by Bree 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I love the books and the movies. The first two were pretty good, and the third was okay, even though they switched some stuff around in it. As for the fourth, I really thought the actors seemed much more mature which made it a little easier to watch, and I was also disappointed when different parts of the book were cut out. I really enjoyed Hermione and her S.P.E.W. campaign, and I was sad when I saw that wasn't in the movie. The house elves were really good in the book, and I wish they could have at least added ten to twenty minutes of them in the movie. But I still enjoyed the movie anyway. Hopefully the fifth movie will be good!!
2006-08-12 19:28:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I absolutely hated the 3rd one! I thought the 4th was a bit better, but they did totally forget the house elves area. I think you should make a point to not read the book before you see the next movie. Then you won't be so disappointed at all the things they leave out. And those others were correct, if the movies were completely faithful to the books they'd be 6 hours long at least!
2006-08-12 18:51:40 · answer #3 · answered by theobromo77 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There hasn't been one of the movies yet that I have "hated" but they did take a lot out of book 4 for the movie. However, they have to - no one is going to be able to sit for 4-5 hours in a movie theater which is what would end up happening if they didn't cut stuff out. The thing to keep in mind is that JK is working very closely with the screenwriter to make sure that important parts are left in so that it doesn't screw up future books. She has a plan here.
2006-08-13 16:21:10 · answer #4 · answered by patgd25 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like all but you're right it had many things that had nothing to do with the original story. I think harry lost his innocence a littleand became mature and that is the diffrence between 4 and the others but it still nice.
2006-08-12 19:08:39 · answer #5 · answered by Willie Black 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought it was good , and the whole point to show that they all are growing up, and going through that time that every teenager goes through, any movie from the harry potter series is good to me, and the next one is going to be better.
2006-08-12 20:04:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the FOUTH harry potter movie?? haha LOL. As for the question, I don't watch harry potter so ?. I just had to bring this to your attention.
2006-08-12 18:46:08 · answer #7 · answered by foreverdreaming 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is NOT possible to place everything in Book in film. If they did film would be six hours long or longer. Where I agree much was missing they just couldn't get it all in. the important things were there
2006-08-12 18:46:21 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i didn't like it too.I mean,where is Dobby and Vinki in the fourth movie?!Nowhere!Some people only liked it because of Sedric Diggory(Robert Pattison) and Victor Krum(Stanislav Ianevski).
I was SO disappointed!
2006-08-12 20:18:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont like any of the harry potter movies
2006-08-12 18:47:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋