In summary:
Bush swore an oath of office to support and defend the Constitution. He has sponsored and signed laws that violate Articles I (denial of Habeas Corpus), IV (denial of Full Faith and Credit), VI (abrogation of the Supremacy Clause), and the 4th (illegal searches and seizures), 5th (lack of due process), 6th (denial of counsel, denial of access to courts), and 8th (no torture) Amendments. He has ordered actions that have violated Articles I (abrogation of Presentment and Bicameral Clauses), III (rejection of judicial authority of federal courts), IV (denial of Privileges and Immunities Clause), and the 1st (breach of Establishment Clause, denial of Freedom of Association, denial of Right to Petition), 4th (illegal searches and seizures), 5th (denial of Due Process, improper Takings, refusal to follow Grand Jury requirements), 6th (denial of counsel, abrogation of Confrontation Clause, denial of public trial), and 8th (no torture) Amendments. He refers to the Constitution as "just a g*d*mn piece of paper". This is failure to support and defend the Constitution, which is a betrayal of his oath of office.
Bush swore an oath of office to ensure that the laws of this nation were faithfully executed. He has put into place 800 signing statements, the vast majority of which assert that he does not intend to follow or enforce a particular law if he doesn't want to. He has lied to Congress about those signing statements, which is a violation of federal law. He has ordered illegal warrantless wiretapping in violation of FISA and Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control Act (18 USC 2511). He has committed actions our own laws clearly define as war crimes (18 USC 2441). He has willfully violated federal law thousands upon thousands of times, by his own admission and according to findings of the US Supreme Court. This is failure to ensure that the laws are faithfully executed, which is a betrayal of his oath of office.
That's just what he's admitted doing, and what the Supreme Court has determined he's done.
2006-08-12 11:34:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
properly i'm no longer specific you are able to imprison somebody basically because you do in comparison to them or disagree with their coverage. you are able to no longer cost him greater beneficial than all of us people. think of of law like a want, which you're making for a fashion you opt for for the worldwide to be run. And, like needs, there is often a area result, no rely if wanted or undesirable. you are able to evaluate first all the flaws that we asked of him the two straight away and not straight away and the outcomes that would have on the remainder of the worldwide around. Humankind can no longer benefit something with out giving up some thing of equivalent cost in return. basically depart him flow.
2016-11-04 11:10:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Im not aware of any "charges"... BUT, I'm sure all you Bush haters, libs & dem-rats will come up with something, ya always do!
At least you all can be counted on for SOMETHING!!!!!!!
2006-08-12 11:40:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Katz 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
corygrph doesn't seem like a Minister. He seems more like a Democrat liberal abortionist.
I doubt the "kind" gentleman can present a source with the president saying "GD piece of paper".
It seems like this man practices libel instead.
2006-08-12 11:40:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
They are still coming in, we'll never know all of them. He should resign and go away like Nixon did. I may have misspelled his name.
2006-08-12 11:42:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tommy D 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
To sum it up damnocrat lies and conspiracy theories That's all nothing else!
2006-08-12 13:49:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
give the liberals another 5 min. they will lie..ummm come up with something.
2006-08-12 11:37:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Work In Progress 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
1...I HATE BUSH...2 I HATE BUSH..3...I HATE BUSH...4 ..I HATE BUSH...THOSE ARE THE CHARGES...PRETTY LIMPDICK.
2006-08-12 11:35:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by bushfan88 5
·
1⤊
2⤋