2006-08-12 11:28:08 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
I think it's ridiculous that someone could marry a person just to turn around and divorce them and try to suck up so much money. Some people have so morals or decency.
2006-08-12 11:32:19 · answer #1 · answered by beadtheway 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion NO! She is entitled so some, but definitely not half of his fortune. They were only married for 4 years so give her a million for each year. He will support his child with her separately and the child will get her own inheritance once he dies, but she did nothing that would entitle her to more than $4 mil. I don't think she is even entitled to that much but he can more than spare that and she does do her share of charity work so I guess that is a fair amount. What she does deserve is Linda haunting her for the rest of her life!
2006-08-12 11:47:12 · answer #2 · answered by Chaddy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no no no, she is capable of making her own money. She is really coming across as a ..real creep. I have NO respect for her and how she is handeling it. He is a fine man and humanitarien.
She is so low. I can't imagine her getting much respect when all is said and done.
She is a bold face gold digger. It is she who should pay Him for the privledge of being her husband,.
He is one of the most brillent song writers in time. She is a flash in the pan. She even has a bwitch look about her. I never felt she was right for him.
I would love to heal his broken heart ;)
2006-08-12 11:43:01 · answer #3 · answered by clcalifornia 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She will be .... He married her (against his families wishes) and they had a child together, all that goes in her favour. But the courts will decide how much. What a shame Paul didn't listen to his children and lawyers when he first met Heather, if he had he wouldn't be in this mess now!
2006-08-12 13:04:37 · answer #4 · answered by angel1902 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He may be a brilliant songwriter but he's not much of a judge of character is he. Why didn't he sign a prenup? He'll just have to bite the bullet.
2006-08-12 19:18:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The law states that she is, but hopefully she may have a little integrity about her and only take a small portion of his wealth.
2006-08-12 12:31:59 · answer #6 · answered by cheeky_beth_62 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Methinks this is their personal business.
Wouldn't like my financial arrangements broadcast to world
2006-08-12 11:34:43 · answer #7 · answered by witchfromoz2003 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. why should she, they only been together 2 minutes ! And if she didnt do it for money in the first place, why doesnt she say stick your money.
2006-08-12 11:31:08 · answer #8 · answered by leigha 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes by law she's entitled to it and she has a kid to raise. it would be patronising to paul to imply that he was fooled into marrying her so tat she could get her hands on his money. he is supposed to be an intelligent man.
2006-08-12 11:35:29 · answer #9 · answered by binksiesbaby 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes; hes got shedloads of cash, and as he married her, she should get half.
2006-08-12 12:09:25 · answer #10 · answered by k0005kat@btinternet.com 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋