....or just one guy trying to agree with himself?
2006-08-12 10:10:27 · 10 answers · asked by george 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Fatsausage, not that you wouldn't be right, but I try not to (just trying to improve).
2006-08-12 10:54:20 · update #1
Yes Fatsausage, in a sense I choose sides too, but I try not too
2006-08-12 12:09:07 · update #2
Yes - but in some ways your right the sons of Abraham cannot reconcile themselves because of whats gone before.
They have so much more in common than they do with the 'others ' they call friends yet they nit pick over ideologies.
I dont know if its in Islamic tradition but the prodigal son story comes to mind.
2006-08-13 11:45:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
whilst it is not neccessarily genuine that he who governs least, governs maximum suitable. evaluate Bernie Madoff: a guy ungoverned whilst he needless to say would desire to have been. evaluate Enron, the S&L catastrophe, the sub top very own loan catastrophe. those sort of issues would have been avoided given proper oversight. yet then, there are a number of situations of overbearing regulation. mom Teresa ought to no longer provide the homeless a place to stay because of the fact manhattan mandated million greenback elevators for a normal 3 tale construction. govt. ought to be greater conscious of us. yet greater advantageous than that, we must be greater discerning approximately what we've faith in. did you be conscious of that, barring merchandising, over 35 billion income propaganda is disseminated in united statesa. each year? And that it somewhat is been at that relative point because of the fact the mid Forties? evaluate this quote from the founding father of this very marketplace, Edward Bernays: "people who control the unseen mechanism of society characterize an invisible government that's the genuine ruling skill of our united states of america. we are ruled, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our techniques mentioned, usually by utilising adult men we've not at all heard of. this would be a logical results of the main suitable way our democratic society is prepared. enormous numbers of human beings would desire to cooperate in this sort in the event that they're to stay mutually as a easily functioning society. In basically approximately each and every act of our lives no count number if contained in the sphere of politics or enterprise in our social habit or our ethical thinking, we are ruled by utilising the fairly small sort of persons who comprehend the psychological methods and social kinds of the masses. that's that they who pull the wires that administration the accepted public strategies."
2016-09-29 05:01:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Totally agree with you sun_is_shining. It's madness and out of control.
sun_is_shining:
I see many individuals who have forgotten how to be truly humane due to their perceived grievances.
War is murder in disguise.
2006-08-12 23:32:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
In the Bible, there is a verse that says "There are 12 tribes in Israel, and they will forever be fighting each other". So that Biblical truth still exists today.
2006-08-12 11:49:10 · answer #4 · answered by chelsea 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Two cultures. Several religions jumping on the bandwagon to further their own agenda. It's all politics.
2006-08-12 10:20:01 · answer #5 · answered by yuvid6 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I see Lurch from the Adams family.
2006-08-12 10:17:04 · answer #6 · answered by KU 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i see neither. I see two religious factions trying to disagree with each other at every turn.
2006-08-12 11:21:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I see many individuals who have forgotten how to be truly humane due to their perceived grievances.
2006-08-12 22:45:03 · answer #8 · answered by Sun is Shining ❂ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does your question define Democracy?
When I read your definition, it brought to mind the USA.
2006-08-12 10:47:30 · answer #9 · answered by fatsausage 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
HUH?
2006-08-12 10:16:36 · answer #10 · answered by butterfly23 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋