Were weapons of mass destruction actually found? Who is the news source, and where were they found?

Answer 1

If you mean " Iraq ",hell no,no such weapons were found, or ever will be.
The "mass destruction weapons" was a title of a scenario, to stimulate UN agreement that SADDAM should be stopped and punished. Henceforth,U.S.A took upon itself this "heroic" mission,and started sending the boys to their doom in Iraq.
what was the result ?

- NO such weapons were found
- Marines getting killed every day
- The Iraqi Oil is being used to finance the cost of the war on Iraq - and now it is financing the cost of the Israeli war on Lebanon - !!!

" Among other reasons of course " !!

Answer 2

No -

Both of the inspection teams appointed directly by Bush came to the same conclusion: there were no wmd, nor were there even programs that could have made any.

A guy named Kay was the head of one team, but I don't know the other one.

They did find about 500 scattered munitions from the mid 1980's (when Hussein was being supported by Reagan) that had a degraded and useless nerve gas. So, there were WMD there in the 80's, but not since - precisely what the U.N. inspection team stated prior to the war.

Answer 3

Wake up and smell the coffee.

Yes, there were multiple old artillery shells, containing mustard gas, and nerve gas. These are WMD's. It is also said that they were unusable as artillery projectiles. But they would work just fine if you set them off in a shopping mall.

No, massive stockpiles of fresh weapons were found.

The confusion has been caused by the terminology of the argument. Which I think was on purpose. Some say no WMD's found some nerve gas artillery shells were found, but no WMD's. Nerve and Mustard gas are WMD's.

The government is also with holding evidence of recent attempts to set up WMD programs by the Saddam government. The speculation there is that this evidence incriminates Germany, France and Russia as supplying illegal arms to Iraq using the oil for Food program as cover. The information is being surpressed under the claim of national security, but really its political expediency.

Answer 4

Yes. If you count mustard gas, poison gas and such as weapons of mass destruction(they are but everyone only counts nukes for some reason). And he had lots of missiles with all kids of warheads too....

Though if your a lib or a dem you must say none were found.

Answer 5

A small amount was found but was judged long expired and of very limited effect. If American Soldiers were exposed to it, they would have gotten sick but not died. So it can not be considered a WMD.

The neocons made a big fuse to make it like there was actually something worthwhile to justify the war.

Answer 6

it variety of feels the right wingers are afloat immediately. in spite of the undeniable fact that there is a kernel of reality in what they say. some munitions were stumbled on yet!!!! those were left overs from the Iran/Iraq warfare and were worthless as weapon because the substances interior had earlier gone undesirable. the coolest deal ought to fit on one pallet with area to spare. So no the strong WMD's the President become speaking about under no circumstances existed after 1991. playstation I deliver Xoxoxo on your red kitty and that i desire your kitty receives properly quickly.

Answer 7

Yes, there were some old munitions of questionable strength found, it was a tiny amount, the conservative news media touts it as the smoking gun supporting George Bush, but even the report says that's not the case, they just leave that part out.

Answer 8

No. What we found were decades-old, broken down warheads that could never be used. Wait a go Dubya and One-Shot Cheney.

Answer 9

Ann Coulter

Answer 10

No ...that was a excused to convince the american people to get behind the Iraq war effort..
It is a shame we have leaders that are so
dishonest.
They wrap themselfs in the flag and bible then lie to us all.