No, because you dont understand whats going on at all.
Youve already proven that.
2006-08-12 09:53:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
China and Russia okay, but what about North Korea? Don't forget Africa.
With regard to stem cells, is that ALL stem cells? There has been a lot of promising research and treatments developed using animal stem cells. Adult humans also have stem cells, which most people don't object to. As president, would you condone using the cells from an aborted child? How about paying women to get pregnant and then terminating the pregnancy half way through for the sole purpose of using their babies for research or "cures"?
I think anyone who cares as much as you do would make a good leader, especially if you don't have any personal financial gain.
2006-08-12 17:05:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by sandcatsle 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
No you wouldn't. You have a eutopian view of how things ought to be, but things will never be that way. Just because you want something to happen doesn't mean it will. If you want to make a difference as far as helping people, join the peace corp. Leaders of nations have the responsibility of protecting the citizens of that nation, and have to have the intestinal fortitute to deal with evil people with swift and overpowering force.
2006-08-12 17:01:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by truckinmann 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, I don't think you would make a good president. What about things back home in the United States? People should start worrying about what is going on within our own borders before worrying about what other countries are doing.
2006-08-12 16:56:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sandra M 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not bad, I might vote for you.
I do have a problem with you conducting "a week of heavy duty attacks on Al-Queda targets". I am not convinced they were responsible for the 911 attacks. Osama bin Laden does not even look like him in his confession video: See Pictures.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
I would much prefer you conduct an independent investigation of the 911 attacks first; And then do what the Constitution allows you to do.
This is a good time to be examining the collapse of the towers, because we are finally starting to get some cold hard evidence, that show us, how those buildings came down. Here is some of the most recent irrefutable evidence available today.
1. We now have eye witness accounts, from people inside of the building, telling of explosions taking place, on different floors, including lower floors, just before the buildings went down. Many of the witnesses, were silenced when the buildings collapsed, but their accounts live on, in just released radio recordings. (I'll try to find them on the Internet for you. I heard the firemens radio conversations, not to long ago.) They went something like this, "What's going on! I'm on the 22nd floor, and I just heard an explosion." "I'm on 72, and I heard one too."
2. Photographs of the buildings, just before it went down, show molten metal flowing out, from the building. Structural steel requires temperatures, well beyond burning jet fuel, to melt. Further, the color of the glowing molten metal, is also representative of high temperatures, beyond that of burning jet fuel. See source at the bottom of the page, for detailed information, regarding structural steel melting points etc.
http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=4884818450327382904
3. A chemical analysis of the molten metal, found at the site, shows traces of a chemical called, "Thermate". Thermate charges are used by professional demolition crews, to cut through steel beams, to demolish buildings. Incidentally, the samples were recovered by a member, of the clean up crew, who kept it as a souvenir memento. Most of the scrap metal, including the pools of molten steel, were recovered by a demolition crew, and discarded. There are though photos, at ground zero, showing beams that have been shearded at a right angle: Slag is shown dripping from the process. Click on photo, in website below; for a close up examination.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2842384983834100001
4. Thermate traces have also been found, inside the bodies, of those exposed to the gases from the molten debris; people such as firemen and clean up crew members.
I found the following video clip, while conducting research. It has a bias slant, but is also very intriguing. Once you see it, you'll never be able to see the 9-ll tragedy the same again: I know I won't.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1519312457137943386&q=loose+change
2006-08-12 16:53:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Joe_Pardy 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
you should be president... you contradicted yourself in the first three sentences. stop war..do not believe in war... week of heavyattacks. geez... you could be president. then you say.. two percent troops.. guard prisons... forces stay in afganistan.. keep iran from attacking others.. establish muslim state.. yet... you would keep u.s. out of mideast politics.. your nose has been there every since the fourth sentence
2006-08-12 17:00:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately, you would be assasinated by the other powers that have no interest in truly solving the globa crisis at present. Remember, our president is a puppet.
2006-08-12 16:54:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by prancingmonkey 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Probably not. It is good you don't believe in war, but apparently you believe in supporting Israel's policy, and that is the cause of all the trouble in the area.
2006-08-12 16:57:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by cpinatsi 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sounds more like you want to be a dictator... things would not be as simple to change as you think.
2006-08-12 16:54:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Heatmizer 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
We'd be better off electing this question than electing you.
2006-08-12 17:09:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by STEVEN F 7
·
1⤊
0⤋